Back to Drew's Views
December 11, 2019
Previous
Next

Imagine No Inflation

Markets

Many folks have now listened to this fascinating interview of the pseudonymous Jesse Livermore by Patrick O’Shaughnessy; which can be found here:  http://investorfieldguide.com/livermore/.

Jesse has some extremely novel perspectives, but you’ll have to slow things down to 0.2x, because he spits economic bars faster than the guy in the FedEx commercial. [1]

Really?

Jesse’s most intriguing supposition is that inflation and interest rates will stay low forever.  Yes, forever.

He acknowledges that the “it’s different this time” statement is – in his words - a dangerous and almost fraudulent claim, but he breaks it all down nicely.  He argues compellingly that the reason we demand anything in return for our money from banks (in the form of interest) is because of a fear that we might not be repaid.  He then asserts that with the evolving mandate of the Federal Bank, now all but solidified by their post-2008 behaviour, we now know we are going to pretty much get our money back in any event, almost no matter what, so we don’t need to be offered much in the way of a return in order to part with our cash, and that keeps things pretty stable.

Of course he is talking about receiving nominal dollars back, not real dollars, but this leads to his second big assertion; he also claims that inflation will be low forever.  At this point of the interview, Jesse was flying, so I might have missed his full explanation; but I suspect it is based on a view that an increasingly-politicized fed will keep a lid on things (or that we believe they will) - perhaps alongside continuously increasing technological innovation – and that as developed economies become demographically mature, this may perhaps impact price anchoring and inflation expectations.

His final, major point, which is somewhat related to the inflation point above, is that accounting rules in the US (in fact, globally) understate the cost of maintaining assets.  In other words, true “depreciation” (which is supposed to mimic or represent the cost of maintaining or replacing assets) is higher than what is reported in the P&L.  P&L depreciation is based on the book value of an asset, an asset that may have been purchased long ago, which itself has a much higher replacement value today.

He believes this thus renders trailing (or indeed) forward P/E ratios incomparable over time, and may perhaps imply that the P/E ratios of what appear to be optically cheap companies may in fact be much higher, because the “real” earnings after a fuller depreciation are much lower.  He naturally has a similarly negative view on ROE based analyses.

I see his point, technically, but disagree with the motivation.  His framework seems broadly based on a one-off asset purchase, not as a serial, continuous process of maintenance and expansion capex, which is what happens IRL.  As the new CAPEX comes in to keep the plant up-to-date, or indeed build a new one, this happens after the inflation has occurred, and automatically increases future depreciation, bringing it more in line with the true economic cost of ownership.  To me, this all should come out at the end when we look at free cash flows (which consider the CAPEX).  And in that vein, Jesse himself concludes that we need to look beyond the P&L to the “true distributable free cash flows that the companies are generating.”  Fair enough.

Finally, Jesse brought a different perspective to the momentum and value discussion, and appeared to do so without any academic baggage (good or bad) regarding empirical evidence over typical overreaction or underreaction time horizons, nor the risk or behavioural explanations of either.

So, I guess, in conclusion, I disagree that interest rates will stay low forever, I disagree that inflation has been eradicated, and I disagree that the market misses the understated impact of depreciation.  But man, I sure enjoyed the interview.  I couldn’t stop listening.  Jesse is very engaging, and Patrick is a very good interviewer.  If you haven’t already, it is definitely worth a listen.

FOOTNOTES

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NeK5ZjtpO-M

Download PDF

Topics

Markets

DISCLAIMER

The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the post’s author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Albert Bridge Capital, or its affiliates. This post has been provided solely for information purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer or any advice or recommendation to purchase any securities or other financial instruments and may not be construed as such. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information in this post or found by following any link in this post.

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Text Link

Heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Text Link
Text Link

A Memo to Investors

I know, these are weird and trying times. It all makes you wonder what the point of stock-picking is. What is the purpose of kicking the tires, looking under the hood, and doing our jobs?

Stock Picking
Markets
Valuation
Asset Pricing
Behavioural Finance
Read More
Text Link

Investors? Possibly you!

FATMAN-G. No, that isn’t my rap name, although vaguely appropriate (I mean, the G part of course). That’s our new moniker for the Avengers[1] of the equity capital markets, to which we have now added Tesla. FATMAN-G is Facebook, Amazon, Tesla, Microsoft, Apple, Netflix, and Google.

Stock Picking
Markets
Read More
Text Link

Avengers Assemble!

Amazon is, very simply, a tremendous company. Google is also a tremendous company. The same goes for Microsoft, Apple, Netflix, and Facebook. These are the superheroes of capital markets. In these FAMANG stocks, the Avengers have assembled.

Markets
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

Cue the Camouflage

The S&P 500 is up 6.5% this year. That’s a total return number, and given what is going on out there, it’s pretty impressive.

Behavioural Finance
Markets
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

The Times that Try Stock-Pickers’ Souls

On first principles, there is one way to generate excess stock market returns over the long term, and it isn’t to “own winners at any price.”

Markets
Factors
Stock Picking
Valuation
Read More
Text Link

Grandpa Stocks

There are young companies out there that are exciting, growing quickly, and very clearly have the world in front of them.

Stock Picking
Markets
Valuation
Read More
Navigations
HomeTeamDrew's viewsPressContact
About Albert Bridge Capital

Albert Bridge Capital manages concentrated long-only equity portfolios for institutional investors.The hallmark of its Alpha Europe strategy is the application of tenets of behavioural finance to a rigorous, fundamental, process-oriented research process.

Regulatory Disclaimers
Stewardship codePillar three disclosureRTS 28Legal & regulatoryPrivacy policyCookies policy
How to get in Touch
Michelin House
Suite 109, 81 Fulham Road
London, SW3 6RD
info@albertbridgecapital.com

Subscribe to Drew's Views

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Albert Bridge Capital LLP is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority of the United Kingdom © Albert Bridge Capital 2021.
Website by SW10media.com
A Memo to Investors
Investors? Possibly you!
Avengers Assemble!
How Did This Even Happen?
Was “Value” Just a Hot Hand Thing?
The Hot-Hand Fallacy Fallacy Fallacy?
Cue the Camouflage
The Times that Try Stock-Pickers’ Souls
A Different Game?
Heads I Win
A New Ice Age?
Grandpa Stocks
Bubblicious?
On Negative Oil and Futures Prices
In Flew Enza
COVID-19 and Equity Markets
Regulators to the Rescue?
Perspective
We Don’t Make Pizzas
Ben Graham the Growth Investor?
Not a Bad Decade
On the Impact of the FAMANGs
Europe vs the US: Is it all about sector exposures?
Behavioural Finance is Finance
America’s Decade
Known Unknowns and Share Prices
Prediction, Publicity, and Paul the Octopus
Are Company Visits Good or Bad?
Everybody Was Kung Fu Fighting?
Voting Machines and Weighing Machines
The DCF is the Randy Watson of Valuation
The Sacrilegious Diaries: Measuring the Impact of Portfolio Turnover
Passively Irrational?
Imagine No Inflation
The Sacrilegious Diaries: The Benefits of Turnover
Stay in the Game
I’m Volatility?
Woody was Right
When You Can’t Wait For Tomorrow
James Harden and Alpha
Groundhog Day and Overnight Returns
Debiasing and Alpha
Peak “Peak Car” ?
The Right Way
The First Step to Regaining Credibility
The Futility of Market Timing
Visualizing the Arithmetic of Active Management
123 Years of the Dow
Sweet Emotion?
Share Buybacks, Bad Companies, and Bear Markets
Risk and Portfolio Theory
Keeping Calm and Carrying On
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator: The Volkswagen Chronicles, Ten Years Later
We’d Rather Not Sleep
Factor Timing, Should You Try?
The Mathematics of Maintaining Bet Size
The Grandfather of Behavioural Investing
On Sexual Chocolate and Semi-Annual Reporting
Island Economies and Risk
Build a Bear?
Data Science and Alpha
We’re all Value Investors
Hunting for Alpha
Career Risk, Alpha, and Contrarian Investing
Passive Flows and Wheelbarrows
God Bless the Shorts
Sell in May, and Go Away?
Equilibrium Happens
Horses and Stocks
Peak Quality?
Bill Sharpe and Hank Aaron
Unwarrented
The Search for Excellence and the Loser’s Game
Fooled by Non-Randomness
Half Hearted Is Half Minded
Still Superman, but without the cape
122 year Dow Jones Histogram: Putting 2017 into context
Pegs, P/E'S and the Value Premium
Rick Barry and Lewis Carroll
Secular Winners and Value Investing
Robots and Alpha
The Voting Machine
Prevous
Next
homeBIOSdrew's viewspressCOntactRegulatory