Back to Drew's Views
December 11, 2019
Previous
Next

Imagine No Inflation

Markets

Many folks have now listened to this fascinating interview of the pseudonymous Jesse Livermore by Patrick O’Shaughnessy; which can be found here:  http://investorfieldguide.com/livermore/.

Jesse has some extremely novel perspectives, but you’ll have to slow things down to 0.2x, because he spits economic bars faster than the guy in the FedEx commercial. [1]

Really?

Jesse’s most intriguing supposition is that inflation and interest rates will stay low forever.  Yes, forever.

He acknowledges that the “it’s different this time” statement is – in his words - a dangerous and almost fraudulent claim, but he breaks it all down nicely.  He argues compellingly that the reason we demand anything in return for our money from banks (in the form of interest) is because of a fear that we might not be repaid.  He then asserts that with the evolving mandate of the Federal Bank, now all but solidified by their post-2008 behaviour, we now know we are going to pretty much get our money back in any event, almost no matter what, so we don’t need to be offered much in the way of a return in order to part with our cash, and that keeps things pretty stable.

Of course he is talking about receiving nominal dollars back, not real dollars, but this leads to his second big assertion; he also claims that inflation will be low forever.  At this point of the interview, Jesse was flying, so I might have missed his full explanation; but I suspect it is based on a view that an increasingly-politicized fed will keep a lid on things (or that we believe they will) - perhaps alongside continuously increasing technological innovation – and that as developed economies become demographically mature, this may perhaps impact price anchoring and inflation expectations.

His final, major point, which is somewhat related to the inflation point above, is that accounting rules in the US (in fact, globally) understate the cost of maintaining assets.  In other words, true “depreciation” (which is supposed to mimic or represent the cost of maintaining or replacing assets) is higher than what is reported in the P&L.  P&L depreciation is based on the book value of an asset, an asset that may have been purchased long ago, which itself has a much higher replacement value today.

He believes this thus renders trailing (or indeed) forward P/E ratios incomparable over time, and may perhaps imply that the P/E ratios of what appear to be optically cheap companies may in fact be much higher, because the “real” earnings after a fuller depreciation are much lower.  He naturally has a similarly negative view on ROE based analyses.

I see his point, technically, but disagree with the motivation.  His framework seems broadly based on a one-off asset purchase, not as a serial, continuous process of maintenance and expansion capex, which is what happens IRL.  As the new CAPEX comes in to keep the plant up-to-date, or indeed build a new one, this happens after the inflation has occurred, and automatically increases future depreciation, bringing it more in line with the true economic cost of ownership.  To me, this all should come out at the end when we look at free cash flows (which consider the CAPEX).  And in that vein, Jesse himself concludes that we need to look beyond the P&L to the “true distributable free cash flows that the companies are generating.”  Fair enough.

Finally, Jesse brought a different perspective to the momentum and value discussion, and appeared to do so without any academic baggage (good or bad) regarding empirical evidence over typical overreaction or underreaction time horizons, nor the risk or behavioural explanations of either.

So, I guess, in conclusion, I disagree that interest rates will stay low forever, I disagree that inflation has been eradicated, and I disagree that the market misses the understated impact of depreciation.  But man, I sure enjoyed the interview.  I couldn’t stop listening.  Jesse is very engaging, and Patrick is a very good interviewer.  If you haven’t already, it is definitely worth a listen.


Subscribe and sign up with your email address to receive the latest news and updates
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

FOOTNOTES

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NeK5ZjtpO-M

Download PDF

Topics

Markets

DISCLAIMER

The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the post’s author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Albert Bridge Capital, or its affiliates. This post has been provided solely for information purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer or any advice or recommendation to purchase any securities or other financial instruments and may not be construed as such. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information in this post or found by following any link in this post.

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Text Link

Heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Text Link
Text Link

OK, 2022 Was a Disaster for Tesla - What Next?

There still could be significant downside, but it's going to take fundamental misses to get there; and $TSLAQ has to admit that the screaming short at $400 has fallen 70%.

Markets
Behavioural Finance
Read More
Text Link

Stock Market History, Illuminated, 2022 Style

I’ve been keeping a graphic of the long-term performance of the US stock market for many years now, and I’ve been sharing this information in the histogram below. I think it does a reasonable job of revealing how long-term returns are manufactured and the tilts over time. I’ve color-chunked the data by decade to highlight decades of historical weakness as well as periods of strength. I’ve also added additional tables and charts which I think are interesting, and in some cases, stunning.

Asset Pricing
Factors
Markets
Valuation
Read More
Text Link

What Stands in the Way Becomes the Way

I don’t think that Aurelius, Frost or Zweig would disagree that the road less traveled might have a little more alpha in it.

Markets
Behavioural Finance
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

For Investors, a "Never-Sell" Mantra is a Song for Fools

On the misleading claims of Hendrik Bessembinder about diversification; and the convenient, post-hoc, and the spurious conclusion to always buy and hold.

Asset Pricing
Markets
Portfolio Management
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

A Conversation between Drew Dickson and Morgan Housel

A discussion between Drew Dickson of Albert Bridge Capital, Morgan Housel of The Collaborative Fund; moderated by Jamie Catherwood of O'Shaughnessy Asset Management

Asset Pricing
Behavioural Finance
Markets
Read More
Text Link

Conversation with Dr. Daniel Crosby on his Standard Deviations Podcast

Drew joins Dr. Daniel Crosby on the Standard Deviations podcast.

Asset Pricing
Behavioural Finance
Markets
Sports
Read More
Navigations
HomeTeamDrew's viewsPressContact
Disclaimers
Legal & regulatoryPrivacy policyCookies policy
How to get in Touch
info@albertbridgecapital.com

Subscribe to Drew's Views

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
© Albert Bridge Capital 2022
Website by SW10media.com
homeTeamdrew's viewspressCOntactDisclaimers