Back to Drew's Views
December 11, 2019
Previous
Next

Keeping Calm and Carrying On

Markets
Valuation

October unleashed a storm upon financial markets.  Here in Europe, we hadn’t had one since Brexit, but had many before then, and will surely have many more.  Bad weather is a feature of investing, and as the stewards of long-term capital, we need to balance action and inaction during these bouts of market turmoil.  In some cases, we need to seek shelter, but in others we must ask ourselves if the weathermen are getting a little too excited. [1]  

In other words, we should not blindly or naïvely sit tight, assuming that the market is 100% wrong about everything; nor should we let emotions dominate our decision-making, nor deviate from our core principles. From an individual stock perspective, we should try our best to never panic about any position.  In fact, when we feel like we are approaching our own maximum fear, we should remind ourselves that Mr. Market probably feels even worse.  And since he is the one making the price, we need to consider what he might be baking in.  At the same time, we must be prepared to contemplate that our initial hypothesis might be more tested than we might have expected, or even be wrong.  There is no value in remaining steadfast when the facts change.

Keeping Calm.png
Look through the storm, but remember that it is a storm.

We also want to be opportunistic.  This is a long game, and if we notice an unwarranted idiosyncratic move (or lack thereof) that tilts the risk/reward equation further in our direction, we should take advantage of that.  As we have discussed in other pieces, the indiscreet machine-led behaviour of the machine-reading algo of machine-generated headlines can open up tremendous windows of silliness.  Our view – which is contrary to recently-emerged popular opinion – is that these judgment-lacking dumb robots aren’t bad for the alpha business, they are good – as long as we exercise objective judgment in the process.    

Moreover, from a portfolio perspective, making top-down calls is not a part of our process, nor is it essential.  While some of our companies are more affected by macroeconomic fundamentals than others, our job is to be on top of all developments (macro and micro), and objectively model the impact of high or low oil prices, Chinese demand, and global trade wars as they happen.  We then task ourselves to discover if there are any opportunities to take advantage of Mr Market when he under or over-extrapolates fundamental datapoints due to his top-down view; a view that almost certainly is poisoned by emotion.

For what it is worth, we have all known about globally-coordinated central bank intervention propping up asset prices, and we’ve known about bombastic political tirades, retaliatory tariffs, and ongoing trade wars.  We’ve also known about the spectre of rising interest rates.  We’ve known about these things for many months, even years.  The only new information in the first three weeks of October was that the market decided it wanted to care.  Will it care even more tomorrow?  Will it care at all next year?  We do not know.  No one knows.

At the lows last month, the S&P 500 was down 10.6%.  It bounced from those lows, but still closed off 6.9% for the month of October, while the Eurostoxx 600 was down 5.5%.  These not only might have been the right moves, but markets might be down another 5-7% in the next month or two.  They also might not.  They might be up 5-7%, or half that, or twice that. Again, we don’t know, and no one knows.

But the market sometimes thinks it knows.  As such, we should all prepare ourselves for the rising chorus of “the market doesn’t care about fundamentals”.  This siren song is tough for many to resist, and leads to panic selling (often called “risk management”).  This is a test that the consensus investor fails every single time.  When Mr. Market throws in the towel on stock-picking, this is exactly the time when stock-picking can shine.  

With all this - and this is perhaps particularly important to do in times like these - we must all remind ourselves that the fundamentals are actually the only things that matter. Narratives are important indeed, especially in the short and intermediate terms [2], but at the end of the day (or should I say, decade), stocks that beat expectations go up, and stocks that miss them go down.

FOOTNOTES

[1] Kind of like this guy:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_WcJ3t3xP4

[2] Ben Hunt at Epsilon Theory believes that narratives are the only thing that matter, even in the long-run; but were going to go with a different Ben here (Graham) and concede that they are indeed voting machines in the short and intermediate run, but weighing machines in the long term.  Fundamentals and narratives are ultimately joined at the hip.

Download PDF

Topics

Markets
Valuation

DISCLAIMER

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Text Link

Heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Text Link
Text Link

Investors? Possibly you!

FATMAN-G. No, that isn’t my rap name, although vaguely appropriate (I mean, the G part of course). That’s our new moniker for the Avengers[1] of the equity capital markets, to which we have now added Tesla. FATMAN-G is Facebook, Amazon, Tesla, Microsoft, Apple, Netflix, and Google.

Stock Picking
Markets
Read More
Text Link

Avengers Assemble!

Amazon is, very simply, a tremendous company. Google is also a tremendous company. The same goes for Microsoft, Apple, Netflix, and Facebook. These are the superheroes of capital markets. In these FAMANG stocks, the Avengers have assembled.

Markets
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

Was “Value” Just a Hot Hand Thing?

In 1861, at the outset of the Civil War in the United States, Union Pacific issued 20 shares in its IPO.

Behavioural Finance
Factors
Valuation
Asset Pricing
Read More
Text Link

Cue the Camouflage

The S&P 500 is up 6.5% this year. That’s a total return number, and given what is going on out there, it’s pretty impressive.

Behavioural Finance
Markets
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

The Times that Try Stock-Pickers’ Souls

On first principles, there is one way to generate excess stock market returns over the long term, and it isn’t to “own winners at any price.”

Markets
Factors
Stock Picking
Valuation
Read More
Text Link

A New Ice Age?

I’ll spend $3 at the 7-11 for a bag of ice, and drop it in a cooler. I really like ice.

Valuation
Stock Picking
Read More
Navigations
HomeTeamDrew's viewsPressContact
About Albert Bridge Capital

Albert Bridge Capital manages concentrated long-only equity portfolios for institutional investors.The hallmark of its Alpha Europe strategy is the application of tenets of behavioural finance to a rigorous, fundamental, process-oriented research process.

Regulatory Disclaimers
Stewardship codePillar three disclosureRTS 28Legal & regulatoryPrivacy policyCookies policy
How to get in Touch
Michelin House
Suite 109, 81 Fulham Road
London, SW3 6RD
info@albertbridgecapital.com
+44 (0) 203 826 0206

Subscribe to Drew's Views

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Albert Bridge Capital LLP is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority of the United Kingdom © Albert Bridge Capital 2021.
Website by SW10media.com
Investors? Possibly you!
Avengers Assemble!
How Did This Even Happen?
Was “Value” Just a Hot Hand Thing?
The Hot-Hand Fallacy Fallacy Fallacy?
Cue the Camouflage
The Times that Try Stock-Pickers’ Souls
A Different Game?
Heads I Win
A New Ice Age?
Grandpa Stocks
Bubblicious?
On Negative Oil and Futures Prices
In Flew Enza
COVID-19 and Equity Markets
Regulators to the Rescue?
Perspective
We Don’t Make Pizzas
Ben Graham the Growth Investor?
Not a Bad Decade
On the Impact of the FAMANGs
Europe vs the US: Is it all about sector exposures?
Behavioural Finance is Finance
America’s Decade
Known Unknowns and Share Prices
Prediction, Publicity, and Paul the Octopus
Are Company Visits Good or Bad?
Everybody Was Kung Fu Fighting?
Voting Machines and Weighing Machines
The DCF is the Randy Watson of Valuation
The Sacrilegious Diaries: Measuring the Impact of Portfolio Turnover
Passively Irrational?
Imagine No Inflation
The Sacrilegious Diaries: The Benefits of Turnover
Stay in the Game
I’m Volatility?
Woody was Right
When You Can’t Wait For Tomorrow
James Harden and Alpha
Groundhog Day and Overnight Returns
Debiasing and Alpha
Peak “Peak Car” ?
The Right Way
The First Step to Regaining Credibility
The Futility of Market Timing
Visualizing the Arithmetic of Active Management
123 Years of the Dow
Sweet Emotion?
Share Buybacks, Bad Companies, and Bear Markets
Risk and Portfolio Theory
Keeping Calm and Carrying On
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator: The Volkswagen Chronicles, Ten Years Later
We’d Rather Not Sleep
Factor Timing, Should You Try?
The Mathematics of Maintaining Bet Size
The Grandfather of Behavioural Investing
On Sexual Chocolate and Semi-Annual Reporting
Island Economies and Risk
Build a Bear?
Data Science and Alpha
We’re all Value Investors
Hunting for Alpha
Career Risk, Alpha, and Contrarian Investing
Passive Flows and Wheelbarrows
God Bless the Shorts
Sell in May, and Go Away?
Equilibrium Happens
Horses and Stocks
Peak Quality?
Bill Sharpe and Hank Aaron
Unwarrented
The Search for Excellence and the Loser’s Game
Fooled by Non-Randomness
Half Hearted Is Half Minded
Still Superman, but without the cape
122 year Dow Jones Histogram: Putting 2017 into context
Pegs, P/E'S and the Value Premium
Rick Barry and Lewis Carroll
Secular Winners and Value Investing
Robots and Alpha
The Voting Machine
Prevous
Next
hometeamdrew's viewspressCOntactRegulatory