Back to Drew's Views
December 11, 2019
Previous
Next

Share Buybacks, Bad Companies, and Bear Markets

Markets

The star has fallen for a few companies out there, and for those that had previous share buyback programs, there have been some of the predictable “see I told you so” articles written about them.

We agree with some of their arguments, but disagree with most.  

Kinda depends on who is doing the buyback...

Firstly, we should stop and think about a couple of points here.  After a stock blows up (for reasons that may have nothing to do with share buybacks), or indeed after the overall market drops precipitously, we will always be able to find instances where some share buybacks were done at higher prices.  Performing a post-hoc, after-the-fact lookback to hunt for examples of post-buyback underperforming stocks is anomaly dredging, plain and simple.  

To reduce the sample bias, these naysayers would need to study a dataset of all companies that did share buybacks, and see what they find. We suspect that some of those companies that did share buybacks will have underperformed, and some will have outperformed.

If we were going to guess, we’d bet things are pretty evenly distributed on both sides of the mean; and if anything there might be a slight (or not so slight) outperformance tilt toward the companies that repurchased shares.  But again, we shouldn’t guess about this, we should look at the data .[1]  

Naturally, in some of the negative cases, there will have been some buyback activity in names that ultimately suffered for a myriad of potential reasons (from poor products to poor management). [2]  However, correlation and causation can be easily confused, and we shouldn’t start doing it here.  

And yes, some management teams can overpay for their shares. That is a bad thing. That isn’t value investing.  But just because Jeff Immelt overpaid for his own shares, it doesn’t mean share buybacks didn’t make sense for anyone else.

In addition, if a market move (say, for example, this drop we’ve had since early October) takes shares lower, that similarly does not imply that previous buybacks were ill-informed, no more than buybacks before the market rips higher were well-timed.  That isn’t idiosyncratic stuff, that is just beta.  It is the rare (any?) fund manager that is a good market timer; and the skillful market-timing CEO or CFO is even more elusive.

Bottom line is that a buyback makes great sense if it is the best use of cash, the shares are under-priced, and it doesn’t put the company in any financial duress.  It’s that simple.  

But…

There have been some cases where buyback activity may have ultimately put a company in some sort of duress from a balance sheet perspective yet we’d have to ask ourselves whether or not share buybacks trail-blazed their paths to ruin, or if they were merely shortened by them.  And even in those cases, for every GM where the management overpaid for their own shares, there is probably an Apple where they underpaid.  And for every GE that bought back its own shares at higher prices, there is probably a HP or two that overpaid for acquisitions (either with cash, stock, or both) instead of decreasing their own share count.  

Finally, despite our view that we should be broadly agnostic about share buybacks and objective about their benefits, we will say this; if share buybacks aren’t really share buybacks, but instead are well-timed re-distributions of excess company cash to the management team, well, then they indeed are horrible, and value destroying (for everyone not working in the C-Suite).

There are dozens of companies out there that are serial issuers of options as a form of helping company executives to pocket a significant amount of additional cash (and paying capital gains for the comp rather than the top marginal tax rate).  These companies will typically be as quiet as possible about these grants (often masking them from “adjusted” operating metrics).  As these options vest, the calls are exercised, and the selling commences; it’s not coincidental that these same companies will decide (and excitedly announce) a big share buyback that overlaps with these sales.  This is nothing short of institutionalised embezzlement and borderline tax fraud, and somehow, it is legal.

We won’t mention these companies by name. They know who they are, and – unsurprisingly – they don’t care.

FOOTNOTES

[1] And even here, where “buybackers” outperform, they may be outperforming for reasons that also are merely correlated with the buyback, not caused by the buyback.  It could just be a good company, generating lots of cash, that goes from being a lot undervalued to a little undervalued, all while the share buybacks are continuing.  To really separate the two, we’d need a dataset of companies that had share buybacks during period A, compared to companies that didn’t, but where both groups did no buybacks in period B, the evaluation period.  And even then, there may be some negative signal for companies that have share buyback programs, but then all-of-the-sudden stop doing them.  Bottom line is we can’t draw any conclusions about share buybacks just because one famous company that has been in the Dow Jones Industrial Average since the 19th century falls on hard times.  There is better work to be done first.

[2]  Image Source:  My Myself and Irene (2000), Twentieth Century Fox

Download PDF

Topics

Markets

DISCLAIMER

The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the post’s author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Albert Bridge Capital, or its affiliates. This post has been provided solely for information purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer or any advice or recommendation to purchase any securities or other financial instruments and may not be construed as such. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information in this post or found by following any link in this post.

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Text Link

Heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Text Link
Text Link

Sell in May and Go Away?

Turns out there may actually be something to the old Sell in May and Go Away adage - at least over the last 80+ years.

Markets
Asset Pricing
Read More
Text Link

If Growth Stocks Sell Off Will They Bring Value Stocks Down with Them?

Growth stocks crushed just about everything from 2017 through 2021. Not that they necessarily will, but if they do give back some or all of their gains, given their weightings, times will be tough for broader indices. But what about the value names within them, will they sell off in sympathy as well? Of course no one knows, including ourselves, but we take a quick look at behavior of value names as the tech bubble sold off from 2000 through 2002. This example may be worth some consideration.

Markets
Factors
Read More
Text Link

Stock Market History, Illuminated

Some year-end charts and tables asking some big questions about what comes next.

Asset Pricing
Factors
Markets
Valuation
Read More
Text Link

Which One Are You?

So, if you are in the taxi, what is your first move (and you can’t say “do nothing”). Are you trimming or adding?

Markets
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

Just How Cheap is Europe vs. the US, and Should it Be?

As it turns out, it isn’t that the people are paying a bigger growth premium for US Growth over European Growth; but instead it is that people are paying a (much) bigger multiple for US Value than for European Value.

Markets
Stock Picking
Valuation
Read More
Text Link

Are American Companies Better than European Ones?

If we again go back and start the clock on January 1, 1980, and stop it thirty years later on December 31, 2009, we see that the S&P 500 generated annual total returns (with dividends) of 11.5%. During that exact same period, guess what the annual returns of the MSCI Europe were? Also 11.5%. This last decade, however, things have gotten out of whack.

Markets
Stock Picking
Read More
Navigations
HomeTeamDrew's viewsPressContact
Disclaimers
Legal & regulatoryPrivacy policyCookies policy
How to get in Touch
info@albertbridgecapital.com

Subscribe to Drew's Views

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
© Albert Bridge Capital 2022
Website by SW10media.com
On the Relationship Between Gasoline Prices and Vehicle Demand
Sell in May and Go Away?
The Politics of Passive Investing
If Growth Stocks Sell Off Will They Bring Value Stocks Down with Them?
Stock Market History, Illuminated
Which One Are You?
Was Ben Graham a Quant?
Do Short Term Flows Permanently Affect Share Prices?
Just How Cheap is Europe vs. the US, and Should it Be?
Are American Companies Better than European Ones?
Rumpelstiltskin and Meme Stock Investing
Archegos, Disclosure, and Price Discovery
It's All About the Fundies
On Unlimited Upside
A Memo to Investors
Investors? Possibly you!
Avengers Assemble!
How Did This Even Happen?
Was “Value” Just a Hot Hand Thing?
The Hot-Hand Fallacy Fallacy Fallacy?
Cue the Camouflage
The Times that Try Stock-Pickers’ Souls
A Different Game?
Heads I Win
A New Ice Age?
Grandpa Stocks
Bubblicious?
On Negative Oil and Futures Prices
In Flew Enza
COVID-19 and Equity Markets
Regulators to the Rescue?
Perspective
We Don’t Make Pizzas
Ben Graham the Growth Investor?
Not a Bad Decade
On the Impact of the FAMANGs
Europe vs the US: Is it all about sector exposures?
Behavioural Finance is Finance
America’s Decade
Known Unknowns and Share Prices
Prediction, Publicity, and Paul the Octopus
Are Company Visits Good or Bad?
Everybody Was Kung Fu Fighting?
Voting Machines and Weighing Machines
The DCF is the Randy Watson of Valuation
The Sacrilegious Diaries: Measuring the Impact of Portfolio Turnover
Passively Irrational?
Imagine No Inflation
The Sacrilegious Diaries: The Benefits of Turnover
Stay in the Game
I’m Volatility?
Woody was Right
When You Can’t Wait For Tomorrow
James Harden and Alpha
Groundhog Day and Overnight Returns
Debiasing and Alpha
Peak “Peak Car” ?
The Right Way
The First Step to Regaining Credibility
The Futility of Market Timing
Visualizing the Arithmetic of Active Management
123 Years of the Dow
Sweet Emotion?
Share Buybacks, Bad Companies, and Bear Markets
Risk and Portfolio Theory
Keeping Calm and Carrying On
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator: The Volkswagen Chronicles, Ten Years Later
We’d Rather Not Sleep
Factor Timing, Should You Try?
The Mathematics of Maintaining Bet Size
The Grandfather of Behavioural Investing
On Sexual Chocolate and Semi-Annual Reporting
Island Economies and Risk
Build a Bear?
Data Science and Alpha
We’re all Value Investors
Hunting for Alpha
Career Risk, Alpha, and Contrarian Investing
Passive Flows and Wheelbarrows
God Bless the Shorts
Equilibrium Happens
Horses and Stocks
Peak Quality?
Bill Sharpe and Hank Aaron
Unwarrented
The Search for Excellence and the Loser’s Game
Fooled by Non-Randomness
Half Hearted Is Half Minded
Still Superman, but without the cape
122 year Dow Jones Histogram: Putting 2017 into context
Pegs, P/E'S and the Value Premium
Rick Barry and Lewis Carroll
Secular Winners and Value Investing
On Passive Flows, Smart Money, and Alpha
The Voting Machine
Prevous
Next
homeTeamdrew's viewspressCOntactDisclaimers