Back to Drew's Views
December 11, 2019
Previous
Next

The Right Way

Markets

Following on our last post “The First Step to Regaining Credibility” we wanted to quickly highlight that the difference between the fee structure of a large, diversified, purportedly active fund and a smaller, concentrated, active fund. [1]  

To be clear, we do not think that paying a skilled hedge fund manager (if he or she exists) a management plus incentive fee is terribly different to paying a skilled mutual fund manager in a management fee only structure.  The only question is how to structure the incentive fee.

For those starting from a point that all equity exposure should be passive, that is fine.  In that case, the table below shows a rudimentary comparison of two $30 billion diversified managers, one passive, and one active.  

In this first example, the market is up 5%, and the active manager generates no alpha.  The difference in investor returns is driven by the difference in management fees; and similarly the difference in the fees earned by the manager are driven by the relative difference in the management fee.

Right way 2.png

If you don’t believe in manager skill, or in a particular manager’s skill, then that is the way to go.  

However, if you do believe in a manager’s skill, the picture starts to change a bit.  Even if the diversified manager is mostly closet benchmarking, his biggest relative bets are impacted if there is indeed skill there, as are the economics for both the manager and investor.

In this scenario, if the active manager was able to generate, say, 10% excess returns (only) in his largest active positions, then the manager would effectively earn that higher management fee, and the net returns to the investor would be commensurately higher too.

Right way 3.png

But what if this PM decides he’s had enough of the mutual fund life, and wants to strike out on his own.  He despises asset-gathering and closet indexing, and decides to launch a concentrated fund consisting only of his top 20 active positions, charging a higher management fee, and an incentive fee as well.  You, the investor (in aggregate) then decide to invest 10% of your capital in his fund, and the balance (90%) passively.  

Right way 4.png

In this case, the investor that parks a portion of his capital with the concentrated, higher-fee manager, and the balance passively does nearly as well as if he’d invested in the diversified mutual fund.  At this level of market return, and of excess return, there just isn’t much difference.  

However, we’re not there yet.

Even in the above-mentioned scenario, the fees paid by the investor are still higher with the “passive + hedge fund” hybrid than in the diversified fund.  That’s because the concentrated manager is charging performance fees on the market beta component of fund returns.  This was the subject of the piece we referred to above.  

If however the manager wants to align himself, his investor, and his moral compass; he will charge lower management and performance fees, and only charge the performance fee on excess returns, not on total returns.   At a 1% management fee, and a 15% performance fee on those excess returns, the investor earns more with the “hedge fund manager plus passive” hybrid than he does in either the diversified mutual fund or the passive only vehicle.

Right way 5.png

This comparison also depicts just how egregious the hedge fund manager charging performance fees for beta is.  He is walking home with $60 million that shouldn’t be his.  

Of course, all of this is predicated on the assumption that there may be alpha out there to capture, and for some that may be the bigger question.  But for those that want active exposure, a combination of the correctly-priced concentrated manager with cheap passive beta exposure can be better and cheaper than paying optically low fees to a diversified active manager.


Subscribe and sign up with your email address to receive the latest news and updates
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

FOOTNOTES

[1] For simplicity’s sake, we are assuming this concentrated fund is long-only or – similarly -  a “hedge fund” running with a 100% net exposure.

Download PDF

Topics

Markets

DISCLAIMER

The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the post’s author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Albert Bridge Capital, or its affiliates. This post has been provided solely for information purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer or any advice or recommendation to purchase any securities or other financial instruments and may not be construed as such. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information in this post or found by following any link in this post.

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Text Link

Heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Text Link
Text Link

OK, 2022 Was a Disaster for Tesla - What Next?

There still could be significant downside, but it's going to take fundamental misses to get there; and $TSLAQ has to admit that the screaming short at $400 has fallen 70%.

Markets
Behavioural Finance
Read More
Text Link

Stock Market History, Illuminated, 2022 Style

I’ve been keeping a graphic of the long-term performance of the US stock market for many years now, and I’ve been sharing this information in the histogram below. I think it does a reasonable job of revealing how long-term returns are manufactured and the tilts over time. I’ve color-chunked the data by decade to highlight decades of historical weakness as well as periods of strength. I’ve also added additional tables and charts which I think are interesting, and in some cases, stunning.

Asset Pricing
Factors
Markets
Valuation
Read More
Text Link

What Stands in the Way Becomes the Way

I don’t think that Aurelius, Frost or Zweig would disagree that the road less traveled might have a little more alpha in it.

Markets
Behavioural Finance
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

For Investors, a "Never-Sell" Mantra is a Song for Fools

On the misleading claims of Hendrik Bessembinder about diversification; and the convenient, post-hoc, and the spurious conclusion to always buy and hold.

Asset Pricing
Markets
Portfolio Management
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

A Conversation between Drew Dickson and Morgan Housel

A discussion between Drew Dickson of Albert Bridge Capital, Morgan Housel of The Collaborative Fund; moderated by Jamie Catherwood of O'Shaughnessy Asset Management

Asset Pricing
Behavioural Finance
Markets
Read More
Text Link

Conversation with Dr. Daniel Crosby on his Standard Deviations Podcast

Drew joins Dr. Daniel Crosby on the Standard Deviations podcast.

Asset Pricing
Behavioural Finance
Markets
Sports
Read More
Navigations
HomeTeamDrew's viewsPressContact
Disclaimers
Legal & regulatoryPrivacy policyCookies policy
How to get in Touch
info@albertbridgecapital.com

Subscribe to Drew's Views

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
© Albert Bridge Capital 2022
Website by SW10media.com
homeTeamdrew's viewspressCOntactDisclaimers