Back to Drew's Views
December 11, 2019
Previous
Next

The Right Way

Markets

Following on our last post “The First Step to Regaining Credibility” we wanted to quickly highlight that the difference between the fee structure of a large, diversified, purportedly active fund and a smaller, concentrated, active fund. [1]  

To be clear, we do not think that paying a skilled hedge fund manager (if he or she exists) a management plus incentive fee is terribly different to paying a skilled mutual fund manager in a management fee only structure.  The only question is how to structure the incentive fee.

For those starting from a point that all equity exposure should be passive, that is fine.  In that case, the table below shows a rudimentary comparison of two $30 billion diversified managers, one passive, and one active.  

In this first example, the market is up 5%, and the active manager generates no alpha.  The difference in investor returns is driven by the difference in management fees; and similarly the difference in the fees earned by the manager are driven by the relative difference in the management fee.

Right way 2.png

If you don’t believe in manager skill, or in a particular manager’s skill, then that is the way to go.  

However, if you do believe in a manager’s skill, the picture starts to change a bit.  Even if the diversified manager is mostly closet benchmarking, his biggest relative bets are impacted if there is indeed skill there, as are the economics for both the manager and investor.

In this scenario, if the active manager was able to generate, say, 10% excess returns (only) in his largest active positions, then the manager would effectively earn that higher management fee, and the net returns to the investor would be commensurately higher too.

Right way 3.png

But what if this PM decides he’s had enough of the mutual fund life, and wants to strike out on his own.  He despises asset-gathering and closet indexing, and decides to launch a concentrated fund consisting only of his top 20 active positions, charging a higher management fee, and an incentive fee as well.  You, the investor (in aggregate) then decide to invest 10% of your capital in his fund, and the balance (90%) passively.  

Right way 4.png

In this case, the investor that parks a portion of his capital with the concentrated, higher-fee manager, and the balance passively does nearly as well as if he’d invested in the diversified mutual fund.  At this level of market return, and of excess return, there just isn’t much difference.  

However, we’re not there yet.

Even in the above-mentioned scenario, the fees paid by the investor are still higher with the “passive + hedge fund” hybrid than in the diversified fund.  That’s because the concentrated manager is charging performance fees on the market beta component of fund returns.  This was the subject of the piece we referred to above.  

If however the manager wants to align himself, his investor, and his moral compass; he will charge lower management and performance fees, and only charge the performance fee on excess returns, not on total returns.   At a 1% management fee, and a 15% performance fee on those excess returns, the investor earns more with the “hedge fund manager plus passive” hybrid than he does in either the diversified mutual fund or the passive only vehicle.

Right way 5.png

This comparison also depicts just how egregious the hedge fund manager charging performance fees for beta is.  He is walking home with $60 million that shouldn’t be his.  

Of course, all of this is predicated on the assumption that there may be alpha out there to capture, and for some that may be the bigger question.  But for those that want active exposure, a combination of the correctly-priced concentrated manager with cheap passive beta exposure can be better and cheaper than paying optically low fees to a diversified active manager.

FOOTNOTES

[1] For simplicity’s sake, we are assuming this concentrated fund is long-only or – similarly -  a “hedge fund” running with a 100% net exposure.

Download PDF

Topics

Markets

DISCLAIMER

The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the post’s author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Albert Bridge Capital, or its affiliates. This post has been provided solely for information purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer or any advice or recommendation to purchase any securities or other financial instruments and may not be construed as such. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information in this post or found by following any link in this post.

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Text Link

Heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Text Link
Text Link

Sell in May and Go Away?

Turns out there may actually be something to the old Sell in May and Go Away adage - at least over the last 80+ years.

Markets
Asset Pricing
Read More
Text Link

If Growth Stocks Sell Off Will They Bring Value Stocks Down with Them?

Growth stocks crushed just about everything from 2017 through 2021. Not that they necessarily will, but if they do give back some or all of their gains, given their weightings, times will be tough for broader indices. But what about the value names within them, will they sell off in sympathy as well? Of course no one knows, including ourselves, but we take a quick look at behavior of value names as the tech bubble sold off from 2000 through 2002. This example may be worth some consideration.

Markets
Factors
Read More
Text Link

Stock Market History, Illuminated

Some year-end charts and tables asking some big questions about what comes next.

Asset Pricing
Factors
Markets
Valuation
Read More
Text Link

Which One Are You?

So, if you are in the taxi, what is your first move (and you can’t say “do nothing”). Are you trimming or adding?

Markets
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

Just How Cheap is Europe vs. the US, and Should it Be?

As it turns out, it isn’t that the people are paying a bigger growth premium for US Growth over European Growth; but instead it is that people are paying a (much) bigger multiple for US Value than for European Value.

Markets
Stock Picking
Valuation
Read More
Text Link

Are American Companies Better than European Ones?

If we again go back and start the clock on January 1, 1980, and stop it thirty years later on December 31, 2009, we see that the S&P 500 generated annual total returns (with dividends) of 11.5%. During that exact same period, guess what the annual returns of the MSCI Europe were? Also 11.5%. This last decade, however, things have gotten out of whack.

Markets
Stock Picking
Read More
Navigations
HomeTeamDrew's viewsPressContact
Disclaimers
Legal & regulatoryPrivacy policyCookies policy
How to get in Touch
info@albertbridgecapital.com

Subscribe to Drew's Views

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
© Albert Bridge Capital 2022
Website by SW10media.com
On the Relationship Between Gasoline Prices and Vehicle Demand
Sell in May and Go Away?
The Politics of Passive Investing
If Growth Stocks Sell Off Will They Bring Value Stocks Down with Them?
Stock Market History, Illuminated
Which One Are You?
Was Ben Graham a Quant?
Do Short Term Flows Permanently Affect Share Prices?
Just How Cheap is Europe vs. the US, and Should it Be?
Are American Companies Better than European Ones?
Rumpelstiltskin and Meme Stock Investing
Archegos, Disclosure, and Price Discovery
It's All About the Fundies
On Unlimited Upside
A Memo to Investors
Investors? Possibly you!
Avengers Assemble!
How Did This Even Happen?
Was “Value” Just a Hot Hand Thing?
The Hot-Hand Fallacy Fallacy Fallacy?
Cue the Camouflage
The Times that Try Stock-Pickers’ Souls
A Different Game?
Heads I Win
A New Ice Age?
Grandpa Stocks
Bubblicious?
On Negative Oil and Futures Prices
In Flew Enza
COVID-19 and Equity Markets
Regulators to the Rescue?
Perspective
We Don’t Make Pizzas
Ben Graham the Growth Investor?
Not a Bad Decade
On the Impact of the FAMANGs
Europe vs the US: Is it all about sector exposures?
Behavioural Finance is Finance
America’s Decade
Known Unknowns and Share Prices
Prediction, Publicity, and Paul the Octopus
Are Company Visits Good or Bad?
Everybody Was Kung Fu Fighting?
Voting Machines and Weighing Machines
The DCF is the Randy Watson of Valuation
The Sacrilegious Diaries: Measuring the Impact of Portfolio Turnover
Passively Irrational?
Imagine No Inflation
The Sacrilegious Diaries: The Benefits of Turnover
Stay in the Game
I’m Volatility?
Woody was Right
When You Can’t Wait For Tomorrow
James Harden and Alpha
Groundhog Day and Overnight Returns
Debiasing and Alpha
Peak “Peak Car” ?
The Right Way
The First Step to Regaining Credibility
The Futility of Market Timing
Visualizing the Arithmetic of Active Management
123 Years of the Dow
Sweet Emotion?
Share Buybacks, Bad Companies, and Bear Markets
Risk and Portfolio Theory
Keeping Calm and Carrying On
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator: The Volkswagen Chronicles, Ten Years Later
We’d Rather Not Sleep
Factor Timing, Should You Try?
The Mathematics of Maintaining Bet Size
The Grandfather of Behavioural Investing
On Sexual Chocolate and Semi-Annual Reporting
Island Economies and Risk
Build a Bear?
Data Science and Alpha
We’re all Value Investors
Hunting for Alpha
Career Risk, Alpha, and Contrarian Investing
Passive Flows and Wheelbarrows
God Bless the Shorts
Equilibrium Happens
Horses and Stocks
Peak Quality?
Bill Sharpe and Hank Aaron
Unwarrented
The Search for Excellence and the Loser’s Game
Fooled by Non-Randomness
Half Hearted Is Half Minded
Still Superman, but without the cape
122 year Dow Jones Histogram: Putting 2017 into context
Pegs, P/E'S and the Value Premium
Rick Barry and Lewis Carroll
Secular Winners and Value Investing
On Passive Flows, Smart Money, and Alpha
The Voting Machine
Prevous
Next
homeTeamdrew's viewspressCOntactDisclaimers