Back to Drew's Views
December 10, 2019
Previous
Next

Data Science and Alpha

Stock Picking
Passive vs Active
Markets

As the investment community embraces data science, we should not be blind to the reality that many of our active-management peers are or will be devoting a lot of resource to capturing whatever informational edge they think or hope is out there. In that vein, we listened to another one of Patrick O’Shaughnessy’s interesting podcasts, this one with Michael Recce. Michael had been the head of data science at Point 72 (formerly SAC), then GIC, and is now at Neuberger Berman.  This is the podcast link:  http://investorfieldguide.com/reece/.   If you haven’t heard it yet, you should have a listen.

Data Science.jpg
This isn't us either.

As we discussed in “Hunting for Alpha” [1], our firm’s philosophy and culture is built around a notion that there are no sustainable informational edges in the market. There may have been years ago, but today we believe that significant fundamental alpha can mostly (perhaps only) be generated by an expert, unbiased process; a process which seeks to de-bias itself from behavioural mistakes, and one that takes advantage of Mr. Market when he doesn’t.  The relative objectivity is one of the things that potentially helps us to achieve an analytical edge.  

Yes, the biggest firm with the most assets, the fastest computers, and employees with the most propeller hats will be able to parse out the digital residue from demographic credit card data faster than anyone else can, and perhaps will use that information make a few pennies across a wide range of diversified investible assets; but that has always been the case.  The likes of Renaissance, Two Sigma, and DE Shaw compete here; and we never will, nor should we.  Meanwhile, less diversified (but still asset-gathering) firms like the SACs (aka Point 72s) and Millenniums of the world have always played a similar game.  Even before big data showed up, they were clamouring for that vaunted “informational edge” so that they could get in front of the big mutual-fund supertankers before they made their turns.  That is still their game, but we don’t play it with them.

And to be clear, when we discuss how the study of big data can enhance (or perhaps entirely support) some of these informationally-led investment strategies, we should be clear that there is a distinction between this sort of activity and that driven by pseudo-passive, systematically-active smart-beta strategies.  As we discussed in “Robots and Alpha” [2] last autumn, these guys are going to capture factor exposures that were formerly considered as alpha.  They’ll do this in diversified portfolios across hundreds of securities, without much/any regard for idiosyncratic risk.  That is different than trying to get “the edge”.  What remains after all that pseudo-passive activity is the true alpha.  In the competition for this alpha, the spoils will not only be divided between the informational and analytical edge camps in some proportion, but in the aggregate there will be as many winners as there are losers (in dollar terms).  The net alpha, before fees, will be zero.

So with that, let me re-state my favorite metaphor for what we do here.  We are sitting at a poker table, playing five-card draw against other active managers, and they represent Mr. Market.  In this game, each of us has the exact same cards as the other players.  Each card contains some piece of information about the company in which each player is considering investing.  The winner(s) will be the one(s) who correctly identify which four cards don’t matter, and which one does.  The loser(s) will be the one(s) who misidentify the importance of each card – the importance of each piece of public information.

Will the data science guys know that an automaker’s underlying YoY US unit sales are growing double digits after backing out the out-of-production models to get true LFLs?  Maybe.  Or might they overreact to what appears to be a negative datapoint, when it in fact is positive?  Maybe.  Will they confuse spurious correlation with causality when oil prices move and buy or sell the oil services companies?  Maybe.  Will they understand how successful a CEO may have been at his previous, unrelated company, and that he may have a mandate to repeat the same feat and just needs time? Maybe.  And the same questions should be asked of ourselves and our traditional peers.  Will we confuse correlation with causation, will we naively extrapolate bad news, and will we overreact to vivid news flow?

The rewards to active management don’t change in this new regime.  In the aggregate, they were zero before (before fees) and they are still zero.  We simply need to follow a process that a) realises this fact and b) eliminates our biases so that we may capitalize on others’, with the goal of ending up on the right side of zero.  That should be your goal too.  But again, half of us will fail.

FOOTNOTES

Download PDF

Topics

Stock Picking
Passive vs Active
Markets

DISCLAIMER

The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the post’s author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Albert Bridge Capital, or its affiliates. This post has been provided solely for information purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer or any advice or recommendation to purchase any securities or other financial instruments and may not be construed as such. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information in this post or found by following any link in this post.


‍

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Text Link

Heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Text Link
Text Link

Investors? Possibly you!

FATMAN-G. No, that isn’t my rap name, although vaguely appropriate (I mean, the G part of course). That’s our new moniker for the Avengers[1] of the equity capital markets, to which we have now added Tesla. FATMAN-G is Facebook, Amazon, Tesla, Microsoft, Apple, Netflix, and Google.

Stock Picking
Markets
Read More
Text Link

Avengers Assemble!

Amazon is, very simply, a tremendous company. Google is also a tremendous company. The same goes for Microsoft, Apple, Netflix, and Facebook. These are the superheroes of capital markets. In these FAMANG stocks, the Avengers have assembled.

Markets
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

The Hot-Hand Fallacy Fallacy Fallacy?

Many of you will be familiar with the so-called “hot-hand” fallacy, or (perhaps) the lack thereof.

Factors
Sports
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

Cue the Camouflage

The S&P 500 is up 6.5% this year. That’s a total return number, and given what is going on out there, it’s pretty impressive.

Behavioural Finance
Markets
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

The Times that Try Stock-Pickers’ Souls

On first principles, there is one way to generate excess stock market returns over the long term, and it isn’t to “own winners at any price.”

Markets
Factors
Stock Picking
Valuation
Read More
Text Link

A Different Game?

I was out shooting baskets this weekend, thinking about the concept of inversion.

Factors
Sports
Stock Picking
Read More
Navigations
HomeTeamDrew's viewsPressContact
About Albert Bridge Capital

Albert Bridge Capital manages concentrated long-only equity portfolios for institutional investors.The hallmark of its Alpha Europe strategy is the application of tenets of behavioural finance to a rigorous, fundamental, process-oriented research process.

Regulatory Disclaimers
Stewardship codePillar three disclosureRTS 28Legal & regulatoryPrivacy policyCookies policy
How to get in Touch
Michelin House
Suite 109, 81 Fulham Road
London, SW3 6RD
info@albertbridgecapital.com
+44 (0) 203 826 0206

Subscribe to Drew's Views

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Albert Bridge Capital LLP is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority of the United Kingdom © Albert Bridge Capital 2021.
Website by SW10media.com
Investors? Possibly you!
Avengers Assemble!
How Did This Even Happen?
Was “Value” Just a Hot Hand Thing?
The Hot-Hand Fallacy Fallacy Fallacy?
Cue the Camouflage
The Times that Try Stock-Pickers’ Souls
A Different Game?
Heads I Win
A New Ice Age?
Grandpa Stocks
Bubblicious?
On Negative Oil and Futures Prices
In Flew Enza
COVID-19 and Equity Markets
Regulators to the Rescue?
Perspective
We Don’t Make Pizzas
Ben Graham the Growth Investor?
Not a Bad Decade
On the Impact of the FAMANGs
Europe vs the US: Is it all about sector exposures?
Behavioural Finance is Finance
America’s Decade
Known Unknowns and Share Prices
Prediction, Publicity, and Paul the Octopus
Are Company Visits Good or Bad?
Everybody Was Kung Fu Fighting?
Voting Machines and Weighing Machines
The DCF is the Randy Watson of Valuation
The Sacrilegious Diaries: Measuring the Impact of Portfolio Turnover
Passively Irrational?
Imagine No Inflation
The Sacrilegious Diaries: The Benefits of Turnover
Stay in the Game
I’m Volatility?
Woody was Right
When You Can’t Wait For Tomorrow
James Harden and Alpha
Groundhog Day and Overnight Returns
Debiasing and Alpha
Peak “Peak Car” ?
The Right Way
The First Step to Regaining Credibility
The Futility of Market Timing
Visualizing the Arithmetic of Active Management
123 Years of the Dow
Sweet Emotion?
Share Buybacks, Bad Companies, and Bear Markets
Risk and Portfolio Theory
Keeping Calm and Carrying On
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator: The Volkswagen Chronicles, Ten Years Later
We’d Rather Not Sleep
Factor Timing, Should You Try?
The Mathematics of Maintaining Bet Size
The Grandfather of Behavioural Investing
On Sexual Chocolate and Semi-Annual Reporting
Island Economies and Risk
Build a Bear?
Data Science and Alpha
We’re all Value Investors
Hunting for Alpha
Career Risk, Alpha, and Contrarian Investing
Passive Flows and Wheelbarrows
God Bless the Shorts
Sell in May, and Go Away?
Equilibrium Happens
Horses and Stocks
Peak Quality?
Bill Sharpe and Hank Aaron
Unwarrented
The Search for Excellence and the Loser’s Game
Fooled by Non-Randomness
Half Hearted Is Half Minded
Still Superman, but without the cape
122 year Dow Jones Histogram: Putting 2017 into context
Pegs, P/E'S and the Value Premium
Rick Barry and Lewis Carroll
Secular Winners and Value Investing
Robots and Alpha
The Voting Machine
Prevous
Next
hometeamdrew's viewspressCOntactRegulatory