Back to Drew's Views
December 10, 2019
Previous
Next

Half Hearted Is Half Minded

Behavioural Finance
Asset Pricing
Stock Picking
Portfolio Management

After discovering the next great investment idea, why is it so easy to start with a half-sized position, watch it a bit, and then go full-sized later?   What is later?  Is it when the stock is down 10%, and you get to average down?  Or is it later, after the next positive quarterly earnings report, when the stock is 10% higher?  “Later” can be either of them; and strangely, both feel kind of good, or at least don’t feel that bad.

When you go half-hearted and size up higher, you get some “feel good”.   Let’s call that about 6 units of feel good; and you don’t really regret not investing the other half because you never had it in the first place.

Danny Kahneman and Amos Tversky taught us about loss aversion, and that losses feel worse than similar gains feel good.  Depending on your level of risk-aversion, even the most level-headed among us all tend to feel about twice as bad over a loss than we would over a similarly sized gain.  So if you instead size up after the stock drops, you do get some feel bad.  In this scenario, we feel about 12 units of loss.  This is painful, but not debilitating.  There is no endowment effect on the half you didn’t invest.  We conjure up notions of being smart about holding some back, we convince ourselves that we are pleased to be averaging down.  We sleep pretty well at night.

Conversely, if we go full from the outset, and the stock immediately moves higher, it feels good.  Let’s call that 12 units of “feel good” (twice as many as units as when we went half-sized).  But if the stock immediately moves 10% lower, it feels terrible.  That’s 24 units of feel bad, and it is almost impossible not to beat yourself up for being too impatient.  It isn’t so easy to sleep at night.

In other words, it just feels good going into any investment to “start with half”.  Similarly, when exiting a trade, it also feels pretty good to start by “selling half”.  Ask yourself, how many times have you done this?   If it feels good to you and nearly everyone to buy half or sell half, then we have to ask ourselves the question:  Is feeling comfortable the best way to invest?                

Efficient Market Answer

Assume the stock payoffs are symmetrical in your time horizon (e.g. it can either go up by 10% or down by 10%) and there is a 50% chance of being right or wrong.  In the “half-hearted” strategy, again if we are flipping coins, we’ll get an average of 3 units of feel bad over time. In the “full-throttle” strategy, we’ll average 6 units of feelbad.  Yet the expected returns of owning the stock are zero.  It doesn’t mathematically matter if you go half or go full – it just feels like it does.

Behavioural Market Answer

Jump Right In.JPG

But we aren’t in this business because we think we are good at flipping coins.  Few of us active investors believe we are flipping coins at all. [1]  Some might actually believe that, following their fundamental work and spotting a behavioural bias by Mr Market, that they face a 65% chance of being right.  Some others might actually believe they indeed are flipping coins, but are facing positively asymmetric payoffs (e.g. losing 10% vs making 20%).  Even others might think they are facing asymmetric payoffs and have a 65% chance of being right.

And in every single one of these scenarios (positive probabilities, asymmetric returns, or both) over time, it just never makes sense to start with half.   That’s just math.

So, if you’ve done your work, don’t be the prospect-theoretical investor that Kahneman and Tversky wrote about.  If you think you have the analytical edge, don’t dip your toe in the water, just jump in.    


Subscribe and sign up with your email address to receive the latest news and updates
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

FOOTNOTES

[1] And whether or not some, most, or all of us are is another question.

Download PDF

Topics

Behavioural Finance
Asset Pricing
Stock Picking
Portfolio Management

DISCLAIMER

The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the post’s author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Albert Bridge Capital, or its affiliates. This post has been provided solely for information purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer or any advice or recommendation to purchase any securities or other financial instruments and may not be construed as such. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information in this post or found by following any link in this post.

‍

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Text Link

Heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Text Link
Text Link

Hedge Fund Investing, Turnover, and Taxes

For taxable investors, the impact of taxes on long term post-tax returns really, really matters. But how much exactly do they matter? What sort of outperformance does one of your managers need to generate to offset the penalty of not buying and holding forever?

Portfolio Management
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

OK, 2022 Was a Disaster for Tesla - What Next?

There still could be significant downside, but it's going to take fundamental misses to get there; and $TSLAQ has to admit that the screaming short at $400 has fallen 70%.

Markets
Behavioural Finance
Read More
Text Link

Stock Market History, Illuminated, 2022 Style

I’ve been keeping a graphic of the long-term performance of the US stock market for many years now, and I’ve been sharing this information in the histogram below. I think it does a reasonable job of revealing how long-term returns are manufactured and the tilts over time. I’ve color-chunked the data by decade to highlight decades of historical weakness as well as periods of strength. I’ve also added additional tables and charts which I think are interesting, and in some cases, stunning.

Asset Pricing
Factors
Markets
Valuation
Read More
Text Link

What Stands in the Way Becomes the Way

I don’t think that Aurelius, Frost or Zweig would disagree that the road less traveled might have a little more alpha in it.

Markets
Behavioural Finance
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

Interest Rates and Growth Stocks

It's very possible, if not likely, that the move in growth stocks from 2017 through 2020 probably wasn’t caused or justified by a move in interest rates, but that people believed, and acted like, it was.

Asset Pricing
Factors
Behavioural Finance
Valuation
Read More
Text Link

For Investors, a "Never-Sell" Mantra is a Song for Fools

On the misleading claims of Hendrik Bessembinder about diversification; and the convenient, post-hoc, and the spurious conclusion to always buy and hold.

Asset Pricing
Markets
Portfolio Management
Stock Picking
Read More
Navigations
HomeTeamDrew's viewsPressContact
Disclaimers
Legal & regulatoryPrivacy policyCookies policy
How to get in Touch
info@albertbridgecapital.com

Subscribe to Drew's Views

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
© Albert Bridge Capital 2022
Website by SW10media.com
homeTeamdrew's viewspressCOntactDisclaimers