Back to Drew's Views
December 11, 2019
Previous
Next

Known Unknowns and Share Prices

Behavioural Finance
Stock Picking

Ambiguity aversion sucks.

In February of 2002, Donald Rumsfeld famously introduced known knowns, known unknowns, and unknown unknowns into the lexicon. To complete the permutations, we’re going to add another one here; unknown knowns.

In the investing community, known knowns are priced in.

Unknown unknowns aren’t. They can’t be.

Unknown knowns are when people ignore information in front of their face. This is confirmation bias.

That leaves known unknowns; and man, do investors not like known unknowns. Investors don’t like ambiguity.

Undefined regulatory risk? Undetermined litigation liabilities? Uncertain debt refinancing? These all make Mr. Market panic, and it is where loss aversion creeps in. Actually, the fear of loss aversion creeps in.

Capitalising on Ambiguity Aversion?

Thanks to Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, we all know that losses feel a lot worse than gains feel good, and that it fuels and affects our decision making. We think this is not just relevant for losses that we have already sustained, but for future losses that we think are likely.

When we know that there will be bad news coming, we brace for the impact. But when we don’t know precisely how bad things will be, we do more than brace. We panic. We scatter. We run for the hills.

It may actually be that the expectation of bad news weighs more heavily on our psyche than the actual bad news when it arrives; even if the extent of the bad news confirms our worst fears.

This isn’t just a thing for investors. It happens to everyone. The impact of waiting for test results (whether for medical tests or SATs) can be more stressful than the actual results, even if they are as bad as we expected. Guy Montgomerie, a psychologist at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine suggests “many people try to inoculate themselves by imagining the worst.” [1]  A group of neurologists from UCL and King’s College [2] suggest that there is a “strong relationship between stress and….irreducible uncertainty.” [3] Psychologists have suggested [4] that for those with particular psychological traits, waiting for the results of genetic tests can motivate adverse (sometimes severe) psychological risks. [5]

So why wouldn’t the stress of waiting for bad news affect Mr. Market adversely too?

Of course it does.

Does Mr. Market often imagine the worst? We think he might. And when he imagines the worst, does he suffer from loss aversion and imagine pain that is twice as bad as it really will be? Maybe. Has this featured in the behaviour of some equities historically? We think so. BP in July 2010? VW in September 2015? Both ended up getting some pretty bad news, as bad as the biggest bears imagined. But the bad news was over baked. Once that temporarily “irreducible uncertainty” was reduced - once it became a known known - the ambiguity aversion vanished. And the stocks subsequently recovered from the overreaction.

And the great thing about ambiguity aversion, is that it eventually recedes. It eventually goes away.  

FOOTNOTES

[1] https://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/07/23/the-anxiety-of-waiting-for-test-results/

[2] de Berker, A. O. et al. Computations of uncertainty mediate acute stress responses in humans. Nat. Commun. 7:10996 doi: 10.1038/ncomms10996 (2016)

[3] https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms10996

[4] Lerman, C., Croyle, R. T., Tercyak, K. P., & Hamann, H. (2002). Genetic testing: Psychological aspects and implications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70(3), 784-797.

[5] https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2002-01415-022

Download PDF

Topics

Behavioural Finance
Stock Picking

DISCLAIMER

The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the post’s author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Albert Bridge Capital, or its affiliates. This post has been provided solely for information purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer or any advice or recommendation to purchase any securities or other financial instruments and may not be construed as such. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information in this post or found by following any link in this post.

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Text Link

Heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Text Link
Text Link

On the Relationship Between Gasoline Prices and Vehicle Demand

As it relates to demand for pickup trucks and SUVs, gasoline prices may not matter matter as much as they used to.

Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

Which One Are You?

So, if you are in the taxi, what is your first move (and you can’t say “do nothing”). Are you trimming or adding?

Markets
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

Was Ben Graham a Quant?

The short, and relatively unknown, paper is chock full of wonderful anecdotes and pearls of wisdom, but it was the interview portion that really caught my attention.

Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

Do Short Term Flows Permanently Affect Share Prices?

I’d like to think that prices can get out of whack for some period of time, and in that window, the nimble, unbiased, fundamental stock picker can take advantage of overreactions and underreactions. If they don't, then the M&M propositions truly hold, and I don’t have a meaningful job. However, if this paper is right, and it is only flows that matter, then while the M&M theorems are overturned, I don't have a meaningful job either. If it is all about flows, then I shouldn't play the game.

Asset Pricing
Behavioural Finance
Passive vs Active
Valuation
Read More
Text Link

Just How Cheap is Europe vs. the US, and Should it Be?

As it turns out, it isn’t that the people are paying a bigger growth premium for US Growth over European Growth; but instead it is that people are paying a (much) bigger multiple for US Value than for European Value.

Markets
Stock Picking
Valuation
Read More
Text Link

Are American Companies Better than European Ones?

If we again go back and start the clock on January 1, 1980, and stop it thirty years later on December 31, 2009, we see that the S&P 500 generated annual total returns (with dividends) of 11.5%. During that exact same period, guess what the annual returns of the MSCI Europe were? Also 11.5%. This last decade, however, things have gotten out of whack.

Markets
Stock Picking
Read More
Navigations
HomeTeamDrew's viewsPressContact
Disclaimers
Legal & regulatoryPrivacy policyCookies policy
How to get in Touch
info@albertbridgecapital.com

Subscribe to Drew's Views

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
© Albert Bridge Capital 2022
Website by SW10media.com
On the Relationship Between Gasoline Prices and Vehicle Demand
Sell in May and Go Away?
The Politics of Passive Investing
If Growth Stocks Sell Off Will They Bring Value Stocks Down with Them?
Stock Market History, Illuminated
Which One Are You?
Was Ben Graham a Quant?
Do Short Term Flows Permanently Affect Share Prices?
Just How Cheap is Europe vs. the US, and Should it Be?
Are American Companies Better than European Ones?
Rumpelstiltskin and Meme Stock Investing
Archegos, Disclosure, and Price Discovery
It's All About the Fundies
On Unlimited Upside
A Memo to Investors
Investors? Possibly you!
Avengers Assemble!
How Did This Even Happen?
Was “Value” Just a Hot Hand Thing?
The Hot-Hand Fallacy Fallacy Fallacy?
Cue the Camouflage
The Times that Try Stock-Pickers’ Souls
A Different Game?
Heads I Win
A New Ice Age?
Grandpa Stocks
Bubblicious?
On Negative Oil and Futures Prices
In Flew Enza
COVID-19 and Equity Markets
Regulators to the Rescue?
Perspective
We Don’t Make Pizzas
Ben Graham the Growth Investor?
Not a Bad Decade
On the Impact of the FAMANGs
Europe vs the US: Is it all about sector exposures?
Behavioural Finance is Finance
America’s Decade
Known Unknowns and Share Prices
Prediction, Publicity, and Paul the Octopus
Are Company Visits Good or Bad?
Everybody Was Kung Fu Fighting?
Voting Machines and Weighing Machines
The DCF is the Randy Watson of Valuation
The Sacrilegious Diaries: Measuring the Impact of Portfolio Turnover
Passively Irrational?
Imagine No Inflation
The Sacrilegious Diaries: The Benefits of Turnover
Stay in the Game
I’m Volatility?
Woody was Right
When You Can’t Wait For Tomorrow
James Harden and Alpha
Groundhog Day and Overnight Returns
Debiasing and Alpha
Peak “Peak Car” ?
The Right Way
The First Step to Regaining Credibility
The Futility of Market Timing
Visualizing the Arithmetic of Active Management
123 Years of the Dow
Sweet Emotion?
Share Buybacks, Bad Companies, and Bear Markets
Risk and Portfolio Theory
Keeping Calm and Carrying On
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator: The Volkswagen Chronicles, Ten Years Later
We’d Rather Not Sleep
Factor Timing, Should You Try?
The Mathematics of Maintaining Bet Size
The Grandfather of Behavioural Investing
On Sexual Chocolate and Semi-Annual Reporting
Island Economies and Risk
Build a Bear?
Data Science and Alpha
We’re all Value Investors
Hunting for Alpha
Career Risk, Alpha, and Contrarian Investing
Passive Flows and Wheelbarrows
God Bless the Shorts
Equilibrium Happens
Horses and Stocks
Peak Quality?
Bill Sharpe and Hank Aaron
Unwarrented
The Search for Excellence and the Loser’s Game
Fooled by Non-Randomness
Half Hearted Is Half Minded
Still Superman, but without the cape
122 year Dow Jones Histogram: Putting 2017 into context
Pegs, P/E'S and the Value Premium
Rick Barry and Lewis Carroll
Secular Winners and Value Investing
On Passive Flows, Smart Money, and Alpha
The Voting Machine
Prevous
Next
homeTeamdrew's viewspressCOntactDisclaimers