Back to Drew's Views
December 10, 2019
Previous
Next

Peak Quality?

Stock Picking
Factors
Valuation

The message below is quite compelling:

“We have a quality-focused investment philosophy, and own the best companies for the long term.”

Tough to argue with that one, right?  Basically, it is the polar opposite of what must be the worst pitch of all time:

“We focus on horrible management teams and low quality businesses, and like to own the lousiest company for as short a period as possible, and then turn our portfolio over by selling one miserable business model and buying an even worse one.”

Well, fuelled by some excellent academic research over the last five years, as well as the ever-intensifying canonization of Warren Buffett, Mr. Market has been increasingly attracted to and enamoured by the concept of “quality” investing.  So, let’s explore it.

What is Quality?

Wikipedia tells us that:

“Quality Investing is an investment strategy based on a set of clearly-defined fundamental criteria that seeks to identify companies with outstanding quality characteristics.”

So far, that tells us exactly nothing. They continue, however, with:

“The quality assessment is made based on soft (e.g. management credibility) and hard criteria (balance sheet stability).”
Peak Q pic 1.png
Hurry up guys, there might be a storm headed our way.  

This is a little less amorphous, but one of our peers has written an excellent book Quality Investing:  Owning the best companies for the long term, and have done an even better job than Wikipedia. [1]

In it, they write that there are three broad characteristics that indicate quality; “strong, predictable cash generation”, “sustainably high returns on capital”, and “attractive growth opportunities”.   They do not mention anything about value as a condition, however they do (rightly) suggest that the combination of the three factors above are “particularly powerful, enabling a virtuous circle of cash flow generation, which can be reinvested at high rates of return, begetting more cash, which can be reinvested again.”  

They also highlight some other features that help them to determine the three key characteristics above, and they include “an appealing industry structure”, “multiple sources of prospective growth”, “high-value customer benefits”, “various forms of competitive advantage”, and “good management.” [i]

In it, they also quote Warren Buffett who stated:

“Leaving the question of price aside, the best business to own is one that over an extended period can employ large amounts of incremental capital at very high rates of return.” [ii]

And we can learn even more about “quality investing” by reading Benjamin Graham, Buffett’s teacher and mentor.  In The Intelligent Investor, the term “quality” shows up 77 times.  In it, he highlights “general long-term prospects”, “management”, “dividend record”, and “current dividend rate” as indicators of quality.  Later he mentions “past (fundamental) performance” and “current financial position” as determinants of quality.

He clarifies the former with notions of “earnings stability”, “earnings growth”, and reiterates the importance of “dividend record”; and for the latter he suggests that “current assets should be at least twice current liabilities” and that “long-term debt should not exceed the net current assets”.  He also suggests a “moderate ratio of price to assets”.  He clarifies that the “current price should not be more than 1 ½ times the book value last reported” although that with a “multiplier of earnings below 15 (it) could justify a correspondingly higher multiplier of assets.” [iii]

Fast forward to the 21st century, and the academics started weighing in with more concrete (and testable) notions of quality.  Chan, Chan, Jegadeesh and Lakonishok (2001) discussed the notion of “earnings quality” and suggested that “earnings increases accompanied by high accruals” suggested “low-quality earnings” which were “associated with poor future returns.” [iv]

A decade later, Novy-Marx has emerged as a leader in honing in, understanding, and communicating what he thinks “quality” is.  He compares a lot of other peoples’ definitions ,[v] and has ultimately concluded that gross profitability tells us nearly everything we need to know. [vi]

Cliff Asness and his crew at AQR have done further work in the area, concluding that – everything else being equal – an investor should be willing to pay a higher price for “stocks that are safe, profitable, growing, and well-managed.” [vii]  In their conclusion, they explain how this is a “puzzle for asset pricing” as it is unlikely that the excess returns to quality stocks are because they are risker than junkier stocks.  They even suggest the opposite, that “quality stocks are low beta and, rather than exhibiting crash risk, if anything they benefit from a ‘flight to quality’, that is, they have a tendency to perform well during periods of extreme market distress.”

Even Eugene Fama himself has somewhat validated things, and has added “quality” variables to the Fama-French three factor mode l[viii] (profitability and investment). [2] The results were robust [ix], with positive factor loadings on these quality factors – at least historically – although no risk story was offered why this might be the case. [x]

What Price, Quality?

So “quality” certainly isn’t an area that has been ignored by academics, nor by practitioners.  Given the attention it receives today, surely the question has become whether or not high quality stocks are still underpriced.  If even Gene Fama can’t come up with a risk explanation why “quality” is riskier than “junk” and the boys at AQR (and GMO and DFA and Blackrock and elsewhere) are pouring literally tens of billions of dollars into “high quality” assets, is it at least possible that we shouldn’t blindly go out and buy more “quality” without considering the valuation as implied by the biases of the consensus investor who is making the price for the stock?

In the book Quality Investing, cited above, the authors mention 19 case studies on companies that they felt displayed some positive aspect of quality.   While we don’t disagree that all of them are of high quality (and we own one of them today), we’d also point out that the average P/E ratio of this bunch is markedly higher than the market P/E, and some names in particular are up in nosebleed territory.  Great companies?  Yes.  But would I have rather purchased them four years ago when they were on 12x forward earnings?  Absolutely.

In the authors’ defence, they do somewhat address the valuation issue in the very last chapter of their book where they state that their “quality investing strategy emphasizes quality first, and valuation second”, and then go on to “highlight some drawbacks of traditional valuation approaches”.  They also claim (and it sounds right to us) that “quality companies tend to exceed estimates, meeting or beating forecasts far more frequently than inferior rivals”; but then go on to claim (which doesn’t sound right to us) that when investors don’t participate in obviously “great companies” because they are expensive, and wait for these “tomorrow stocks” to get a little bit cheaper, that “the day seldom comes”.

Our view is that the best investing opportunities are not only higher quality than realised by Mr. Market, but that this feature is simultaneously accompanied by an unsustainably low valuation ascribed to it by that same Mr. Market.  We also wonder about the investing masses that now claim to be “quality” investors profligately refusing to consider valuation in their allocation of capital.  This is not only reckless investing, in our view, but it shouldn’t surprise anyone that the host of “quality investors” (both fundamental and quantitative) might be crowding things out, and taking the juice out of future returns.

And this isn’t the first time Mr. Market has become smitten by quality.  It happened in the early 70’s, when investors en masse decided that it was okay to pay any price for a defensible business with high returns on capital, strong long-term growth prospects, and an excellent management team.  It was called “The Nifty Fifty”, and we all know how that turned out.

Here is an interesting fact, and one that you won’t find on the cover of Forbes Magazine or on the first page of The Wall Street Journal.  Since December 31, 2002 through the end of last year (15 years of data), Berkshire Hathaway shares have underperformed the S&P 500.

Peak Q table 1.png

And in the most recent nine years, Berkshire Hathaway shares have actually underperformed by nearly 200 bps annually, and over 50% cumulatively. [3]

Peak Q table 2.png

The point here is not to detract from Buffett’s aura, or from quality investing, or from his excellent, steadfast wisdom; the point is that routinely investing in quality without regard for price is no panacea.  In Berkshire’s case, they have so much capital now that the best days of deploying it opportunistically are behind them.  However, it is also possible – if not likely - that for the rest of us, many quality names have been bid up too high, and the market environment hasn’t been conducive to finding high-quality bargains?  After all, it was Warren Buffett who wrote:

“Whether we’re talking about socks or stocks, I like buying quality merchandise when it is marked down.” [xi]

Our view is that the intersection of quality and value is where things get interesting.  That could mean owning an extremely high quality company that the consensus investor only believes to be good quality, or owning the mediocre quality company that Mr. Market has left for dead.

The aforementioned Robert Novy Marx, in fact, hit the nail on the head. [xii]

“Buying high quality assets without paying premium prices is just as much value investing as buying average quality assets at discount prices.”

And he adds:

“…the real benefits of value investing accrue to investors that pay attention to both price and quality.”

And the father of it all, Benjamin Graham has himself implicitly stated that high “quality” companies aren’t a buy at any price, and in fact can become overpriced:

“Nearly every issue (i.e. stock) might conceivably be cheap in one price range and dear in another.”

‍

Quality Inn.jpg
Maybe they built this one a bit too high?

And he has even suggested that high quality stocks don’t always stay that way.

“Most businesses change in character and quality over the years, sometimes for the better, perhaps more often for the worse. The investor need not watch his companies’ performance like a hawk; but he should give it a good, hard look from time to time.”

So, as we go out, meet management teams, speak to their competitors, customers, and suppliers, and build a general view about the dynamics and characteristics of the company and the sector in which it competes, and then decide if the reward of ownership more than compensates us for the risks of ownership, let’s remember our golden rule “we buy stocks, not companies.”  

A high quality company does not necessarily make a high quality stock.

FOOTNOTES

[1] And in a stroke of marketing genius, they were able to convince Lawrence Cunningham (of Berkshire Beyond Buffett and The Essays of Warren Buffet fame) to co-author the book alongside two members of their investment team.

[2] And upon the inclusion of profitability and investment, the “value factor” (HML), interestingly, disappeared.  Moreover, the authors stated that none of these five factors were portfolio mimicking state-variables in the spirit of Merton (1973) but were just “diversified portfolios that provide different combinations of exposures to the unknown state variables”.  Fair enough, but if the bar was that low, then why didn’t they acknowledge momentum as the sixth factor?

[3] Even the change in book value as reported by the company has underperformed by 2.2% per annum in this 9 year window.

[i] Cunningham, Lawrence A., T. Eide, P. Hargreaves.  2015.  “Quality Investing:  Owning the best companies for the long term”.  Harriman House.  London.

[ii] Buffett, Warren. 1992. Berkshire Hathaway Annual Letter.

[iii] Graham, Benjamin.  1973.  The Intelligent Investor (4th Rev. ed.) Harpers & Row, New York, New York

[iv] Chan, K., L. K. C. Chan, N. Jegadeesh, & J. Lakonishok (2006). “Earnings quality and stock returns”. Journal of Business, 79(3), 1041-1082.

[v] Novy-Marx, Robert, 2014. “Quality Investing.” Working paper, 1-28

[vi] Novy-Marx, Robert. 2013. “The Other Side of Value: The Gross Profitability Premium.” Journal of Financial Economics 108, 1-28

[vii] Asness, C, A. Frazzini, and L. H. Pedersen. 2013.  “Quality Minus Junk”.  Working paper, 1-26.

[viii] Fama, E., K. French. 1993. Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds.  Journal of Financial Economics 33, 3-56.

[ix] Fama, E., K. French. 2014.  A Five-Factor Asset Pricing Model.  Working Paper, 1-29.

[x] Merton, Robert.  1973.  An intertemporal capital asset pricing model.  Econometrica 41, 867-887.

[xi] Buffett, Warren. 2008. Berkshire Hathaway Annual Letter.

[xii] Novy-Marx, Robert, 2013. The Quality Dimension of Value Investing. Working paper, 1-40.

Download PDF

Topics

Stock Picking
Factors
Valuation

DISCLAIMER

The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the post’s author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Albert Bridge Capital, or its affiliates. This post has been provided solely for information purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer or any advice or recommendation to purchase any securities or other financial instruments and may not be construed as such. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information in this post or found by following any link in this post.

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Text Link

Heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Text Link
Text Link

On the Relationship Between Gasoline Prices and Vehicle Demand

As it relates to demand for pickup trucks and SUVs, gasoline prices may not matter matter as much as they used to.

Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

If Growth Stocks Sell Off Will They Bring Value Stocks Down with Them?

Growth stocks crushed just about everything from 2017 through 2021. Not that they necessarily will, but if they do give back some or all of their gains, given their weightings, times will be tough for broader indices. But what about the value names within them, will they sell off in sympathy as well? Of course no one knows, including ourselves, but we take a quick look at behavior of value names as the tech bubble sold off from 2000 through 2002. This example may be worth some consideration.

Markets
Factors
Read More
Text Link

Stock Market History, Illuminated

Some year-end charts and tables asking some big questions about what comes next.

Asset Pricing
Factors
Markets
Valuation
Read More
Text Link

Which One Are You?

So, if you are in the taxi, what is your first move (and you can’t say “do nothing”). Are you trimming or adding?

Markets
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

Was Ben Graham a Quant?

The short, and relatively unknown, paper is chock full of wonderful anecdotes and pearls of wisdom, but it was the interview portion that really caught my attention.

Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

Do Short Term Flows Permanently Affect Share Prices?

I’d like to think that prices can get out of whack for some period of time, and in that window, the nimble, unbiased, fundamental stock picker can take advantage of overreactions and underreactions. If they don't, then the M&M propositions truly hold, and I don’t have a meaningful job. However, if this paper is right, and it is only flows that matter, then while the M&M theorems are overturned, I don't have a meaningful job either. If it is all about flows, then I shouldn't play the game.

Asset Pricing
Behavioural Finance
Passive vs Active
Valuation
Read More
Navigations
HomeTeamDrew's viewsPressContact
Disclaimers
Legal & regulatoryPrivacy policyCookies policy
How to get in Touch
info@albertbridgecapital.com

Subscribe to Drew's Views

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
© Albert Bridge Capital 2022
Website by SW10media.com
On the Relationship Between Gasoline Prices and Vehicle Demand
Sell in May and Go Away?
The Politics of Passive Investing
If Growth Stocks Sell Off Will They Bring Value Stocks Down with Them?
Stock Market History, Illuminated
Which One Are You?
Was Ben Graham a Quant?
Do Short Term Flows Permanently Affect Share Prices?
Just How Cheap is Europe vs. the US, and Should it Be?
Are American Companies Better than European Ones?
Rumpelstiltskin and Meme Stock Investing
Archegos, Disclosure, and Price Discovery
It's All About the Fundies
On Unlimited Upside
A Memo to Investors
Investors? Possibly you!
Avengers Assemble!
How Did This Even Happen?
Was “Value” Just a Hot Hand Thing?
The Hot-Hand Fallacy Fallacy Fallacy?
Cue the Camouflage
The Times that Try Stock-Pickers’ Souls
A Different Game?
Heads I Win
A New Ice Age?
Grandpa Stocks
Bubblicious?
On Negative Oil and Futures Prices
In Flew Enza
COVID-19 and Equity Markets
Regulators to the Rescue?
Perspective
We Don’t Make Pizzas
Ben Graham the Growth Investor?
Not a Bad Decade
On the Impact of the FAMANGs
Europe vs the US: Is it all about sector exposures?
Behavioural Finance is Finance
America’s Decade
Known Unknowns and Share Prices
Prediction, Publicity, and Paul the Octopus
Are Company Visits Good or Bad?
Everybody Was Kung Fu Fighting?
Voting Machines and Weighing Machines
The DCF is the Randy Watson of Valuation
The Sacrilegious Diaries: Measuring the Impact of Portfolio Turnover
Passively Irrational?
Imagine No Inflation
The Sacrilegious Diaries: The Benefits of Turnover
Stay in the Game
I’m Volatility?
Woody was Right
When You Can’t Wait For Tomorrow
James Harden and Alpha
Groundhog Day and Overnight Returns
Debiasing and Alpha
Peak “Peak Car” ?
The Right Way
The First Step to Regaining Credibility
The Futility of Market Timing
Visualizing the Arithmetic of Active Management
123 Years of the Dow
Sweet Emotion?
Share Buybacks, Bad Companies, and Bear Markets
Risk and Portfolio Theory
Keeping Calm and Carrying On
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator: The Volkswagen Chronicles, Ten Years Later
We’d Rather Not Sleep
Factor Timing, Should You Try?
The Mathematics of Maintaining Bet Size
The Grandfather of Behavioural Investing
On Sexual Chocolate and Semi-Annual Reporting
Island Economies and Risk
Build a Bear?
Data Science and Alpha
We’re all Value Investors
Hunting for Alpha
Career Risk, Alpha, and Contrarian Investing
Passive Flows and Wheelbarrows
God Bless the Shorts
Equilibrium Happens
Horses and Stocks
Peak Quality?
Bill Sharpe and Hank Aaron
Unwarrented
The Search for Excellence and the Loser’s Game
Fooled by Non-Randomness
Half Hearted Is Half Minded
Still Superman, but without the cape
122 year Dow Jones Histogram: Putting 2017 into context
Pegs, P/E'S and the Value Premium
Rick Barry and Lewis Carroll
Secular Winners and Value Investing
On Passive Flows, Smart Money, and Alpha
The Voting Machine
Prevous
Next
homeTeamdrew's viewspressCOntactDisclaimers