Back to Drew's Views
December 31, 2022
Previous
Next

Stock Market History, Illuminated, 2022 Style

Asset Pricing
Factors
Markets
Valuation

I’ve been keeping a graphic of the long-term performance of the US stock market for many years now. In late 2017, I started blogging (and set up atwitter account), and at the end of each year since I’ve been sharing this information in the histogram below. I think it does a reasonable job of revealing how long-term returns are manufactured and the tilts over time. I’ve color-chunked the data by decade to highlight decades of historical weakness as well as periods of strength.  

I’ve also added additional tables and charts which I think are interesting, and in some cases, stunning. You can scroll down to follow along. But first, the histogram:

And before you raise hell about using the Dow instead of the S&P 500 in the histogram, there isn’t really much difference here over the long term. I just wanted more years of data, so used the Dow (starting in 1896). I have total return data for the S&P starting in 1936.

I also like referencing the Dow. I can’t help it. So call me a Boomer. I also like Alice in Chains though, so more accurately described as Gen X.

Looking at the data more recently, it reveals just how incredible the US stock market has been.

Since 1980, the market has been up for the year 83% of the time.

And despite its poor performance this year, cumulative market returns since 2009 have still been incredible. Two down years, 12 up years. The two down years were mid-single digits, while the 12 up years were high-teens.

Last year I commented “this makes me wonder if anyone under 30 – through no fault of their own – thinks that this is the way markets always work?” Well, despite how surprising and awful this year felt for many younger investors, the Dow itself was only down about 7% in 2022. That wasn’t really a big move. You can see in the histogram above that we’ve had plenty of years that were worse.

And yes, it is true that the S&P500 (down 18%) was much worse than the Dow Jones Industrial Average in 2022, but that is because the SPX was/is more heavily weighted to the growthy, bubble-esque names; and this followed 6.1% SPX outperformance in 2019 (over the Dow 30) and 8.6% outperformance in 2020 (both indices were up about 21% in 2021).

And then here in 2022, when comparing to most major markets around the world (and using the S&P 500) the US finally fell down the league table.

 

 

 

Yet if we do a three-year lookback, US outperformance is still extremely impressive, and only beaten by that in India.

 

 

  

And if we go back through the beginning of the last decade, the US stock market has still blown all other major markets out of the water. Significantly.

 

 

 

Of course, we all have different reasons why we think this happened, and we all have different views if 2022 was just a blip, or if the outperformance can continue. I don’t have the answers, but at some point down the road, we all will.

That answer will be that US outperformance from 2009 to 2022 (or beyond) was either driven by something economic(interest rates, free money, tech stock dominance), something fundamental (sales growth, improving ROICs, earnings upgrades), something less so (flows, narratives, memes, psychology, FOMO), or a combination of the three.

It is also not impossible that US outperformance was driven by nothing specifically (aka it just happened).

If there is an answer to what drove this historical outperformance, and we know the answer, then we probably are closer to understanding how sustainable it is or it isn’t.

Clues to the answer may be embedded in the comparative performance of growth and value stocks during the same period. To be clear, this doesn’t mean that outperformance of one over the other was irrational, and it doesn’t mean it wasn’t; but comparing value and growth returns (and decomposing them into fundamentals and multiples) may help us to understand how much (if any) of the outperformance or underperformance was driven by fundamentals, economic policy, flows, narratives, or whatever.

And it has been one hell of a decade (plus three years) for US growth stocks.

 

‍

Here in 2022 specifically, the trend seems to have reversed. That may be temporary, or it may not.

‍

‍

For those interested in avoiding, adding, or revisiting, exposure in Europe; the same drivers seem to have affected things over the past year. And while European growth stocks have outperformed the US during this sell-off, European value stocks have – strangely – continued to underperform their US counterparts.

‍

Moreover, an analysis of the last 13 years reveals that whatever it was that was driving the underperformance of value was more pronounced in the US than it was in Europe.

 

  

 

And reordering this same information, we can compare the performance of value in one region to value in the other, and the same for growth. We see here, interestingly, that value stocks in the US – even during this period of severe underperformance vs. growth – crushed value stocks in Europe.

Similarly, we see that growth stocks in the US destroyed growth stocks in Europe.

‍

So, what does this all mean going forward? Not just the geographic question about where to invest, but the bigger (I think) question about the performance of growth and value stocks.

‍

Well, let’s get back to basics. Starting in the US, for much of the last decade, particularly in the growth space, we saw significantly more fundamental improvement from 2010 through 2016 in US growth stocks than in US value.

 

 

 

‍

Subsequently, from 2016 through the onset of the pandemic, earnings for value stocks actually performed similarly to growth stocks (although, as we know, that was not the case for their share prices).

Then, starting in early 2020, the COVID panic put much more pressure on fundamental expectations for value than growth.

‍

 ‍ ‍

The net of all this is that since 2016, the fundamentals for US value stocks have improved by over 50%, while the fundamentals for US growth stocks have improved by nearly 90%. And sure enough, to accompany the 51% improvement in fundamentals for value stocks, we saw a 97% increase in their value.  

Moreover, accompanying the 90% improvement in growth stock fundamentals, we saw a 132% move higher.

‍

So, after this year’s correction, and since 2016, growth stocks and value stocks have similarly outperformed their fundamental improvement (as measured by earnings expectations).

In terms of what to expect tomorrow, in our view - with at least some of the froth out of the market (maybe all of it?)- we have to focus on fundamentals going forward.

‍

 And we do see that in 2022, earnings expectations for value stocks actually increased, while they started falling for growth stocks.

Moreover, after peaking in 2020, we have seen multiple contraction (P/E multiple on forward earnings) for both value and growth indices.

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

And it is a similar picture if we use the Russell Indices instead of the S&P.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

‍

When we put our global hat on, what is potentially interesting here is that – despite the US stock market selling off in 2022 – it has (strangely?) maintained its premium to Europe.

 

 

 

 

‍

‍

Now here comes the really counterintuitive part, or least something that surprised me when we noticed it last year.

When you decompose the market multiples into premiums paid for growth stocks, I expected the premium to be higher in the US.

It wasn’t.

The premium paid for growth stocks(over value) was even higher in Europe than it was in the US. And it still is.

In fact, it is as high as it’s been in a decade.

‍

‍

‍

And, surprisingly, throughout this episode over the past five years, there has not been a terribly significant multiple premium for US growth names over European growth names at any point in time.

 

 

 

 

 

Which means that European value stocks are the proverbial baby that’s been thrown out with the bathwater, even when compared to US value stocks.

Everything else being equal, European value stocks are trading at a significant multiple discount to US value, and this was not always the case.

Things that (still) make you go hmmm.

‍


Subscribe and sign up with your email address to receive the latest news and updates
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

FOOTNOTES

Download PDF

Topics

Asset Pricing
Factors
Markets
Valuation

DISCLAIMER

The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the post’s author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Albert Bridge Capital, or its affiliates. This post has been provided solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer or any advice or recommendation to purchase any securities or other financial instruments and may not be construed as such. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information in this post or found by following any link in this post.

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Text Link

Heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Text Link
Text Link

OK, 2022 Was a Disaster for Tesla - What Next?

There still could be significant downside, but it's going to take fundamental misses to get there; and $TSLAQ has to admit that the screaming short at $400 has fallen 70%.

Markets
Behavioural Finance
Read More
Text Link

What Stands in the Way Becomes the Way

I don’t think that Aurelius, Frost or Zweig would disagree that the road less traveled might have a little more alpha in it.

Markets
Behavioural Finance
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

Interest Rates and Growth Stocks

It's very possible, if not likely, that the move in growth stocks from 2017 through 2020 probably wasn’t caused or justified by a move in interest rates, but that people believed, and acted like, it was.

Asset Pricing
Factors
Behavioural Finance
Valuation
Read More
Text Link

For Investors, a "Never-Sell" Mantra is a Song for Fools

On the misleading claims of Hendrik Bessembinder about diversification; and the convenient, post-hoc, and the spurious conclusion to always buy and hold.

Asset Pricing
Markets
Portfolio Management
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

A Conversation between Drew Dickson and Morgan Housel

A discussion between Drew Dickson of Albert Bridge Capital, Morgan Housel of The Collaborative Fund; moderated by Jamie Catherwood of O'Shaughnessy Asset Management

Asset Pricing
Behavioural Finance
Markets
Read More
Text Link

Conversation with Dr. Daniel Crosby on his Standard Deviations Podcast

Drew joins Dr. Daniel Crosby on the Standard Deviations podcast.

Asset Pricing
Behavioural Finance
Markets
Sports
Read More
Navigations
HomeTeamDrew's viewsPressContact
Disclaimers
Legal & regulatoryPrivacy policyCookies policy
How to get in Touch
info@albertbridgecapital.com

Subscribe to Drew's Views

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
© Albert Bridge Capital 2022
Website by SW10media.com
homeTeamdrew's viewspressCOntactDisclaimers