Back to Drew's Views
December 11, 2019
Previous
Next

The DCF is the Randy Watson of Valuation

Stock Picking
Valuation
DCFs 1.JPG

I’m not very well-rounded.  I studied finance in college, and finance in business school.  And man could I turn out a perfect DCF.  I could make that model sing.  After joining Fidelity, I remember ramping up on my first sector, and after finishing, I showed one of the senior analysts my fancy-schmancy DCFs.

“Drew, what in the hell are you doing?”

I was crushed.  Here I had been staying up all night for weeks modelling every aspect of the P&L, cash flow statement, and balance sheet over the next 15 years (for all of my companies) - arriving at what must be the fair value of the stock - and this very smart, well-accomplished, senior guy (hi Sanjeev) basically tells me I am an idiot. [i]

Now, you have a choice here to react as I did initially.  You can think to yourself “oh, he only said that because he knows you won’t have time to do all that work” or “yeah, big institutional shops don’t do proper analysis” or “he just knows the PMs won’t have time to review your model and won’t be able to build any conviction in your ideas.”  Sure, some of those points may be true at some shops, but I finally figured out the bigger picture:

DCFs don’t work because they are laced with bias.

Don’t get me wrong, the DCF is the answer to the “what is it worth” question.  The DCF is perfect that way.  But the DCF is both good and terrible.  We are humans, humans build DCFs, and we have biases.   These biases manifest in the DCF, which itself is full of more moving parts than a steam locomotive.  If we get just one of those parts wrong, the error can compound on itself, and before we know it, our thesis has derailed.

If we have an inkling of excitement about a company or a management team (or indeed, an inkling of resentment), then the DCF is the ultimate camouflage machine; burying our biases and emotion behind annual changes in working capital and terminal growth rates.   As I mention above, I could make a DCF model sing; in fact, I could make it sing any tune I subconsciously wanted it to sing.

And even if we do it objectively (as I am sure nearly all of you DCFers think you are) we are only answering the value question.  The DCF doesn’t care about Mr. Market.  I suppose for some that has its advantages, but not for us.  We are public market investors.  We want to seize on opportunities where Mr. Market is making a mistake of overreaction or underreaction that will fix itself anytime within the next three years.  The DCF doesn’t help us do that.  

Additionally, to the creator of the DCF, it can never be wrong, and that is dangerous.  The commander of a DCF sits in the captain’s chair, presses auto-pilot, puts on the blindfolds, and falls asleep, hoping to wake up at the right destination.  Our view is in some cases, that blindfolded DCF captain leads us straight into the Bermuda Triangle of overconfidence, confirmation bias, and value traps.

Of course there is bias in any valuation methodology, and this will be controversial, but we contend that – because of these points above – a forward (not trailing, for goodness sakes) fundamental multiple (e.g. P/E, EV/EBITDA) or an SoP model may sometimes be a better proxy for an honest DCF valuation than a DCF is itself. [1]

DCFs2.png
I believe DCFs are the future, model well, and let them lead the way…

And if the stock performs well over the long term, it will be because the company beat fundamental expectations.  That’s it.  

Moreover, and finally, the DCF can be just as inappropriate for the high flyers as it is for the potential value traps.  

In 2007, the most offensive, egregiously wild Amazon bull estimated that 13 years from then (in 2020) Amazon was going to print nearly $40 billion of revenues. [2]  

Today, 12 years later, the average sell-side analyst thinks Amazon will do over $320 billion of revenues in 2020.  

Amazon has been a great stock, and a big winner for the bulls; but not because some analyst and his or her DCF figured all this out 12 years ago.  Amazon won because they crushed expectations.

On the other end of the spectrum, potential value traps end up not becoming value traps because they turned the fundamentals around.  They started beating expectations.  The narrative changed.  

Fundamentals matter.  Narratives matter.  DCFs don’t help with either, and can lead us astray in our pursuit of the truth - or at least the truth in all of our time horizons.

FOOTNOTES

[i] Coming To America (1988), Paramount Pictures, Eddie Murphy Productions

[1] We’re also aware that there are countless problems with metrics such as EBITDA and earnings as well, including manipulation of these figures, and general problems with accounting metrics vs their true economic value – but we have those problems with DCFs as well.

[2] https://www.albertbridgecapital.com/drews-view-archive/2017/11/9/secular-winners-and-value-investing

Download PDF

Topics

Stock Picking
Valuation

DISCLAIMER

The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the post’s author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Albert Bridge Capital, or its affiliates. This post has been provided solely for information purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer or any advice or recommendation to purchase any securities or other financial instruments and may not be construed as such. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information in this post or found by following any link in this post.

‍

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Text Link

Heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Text Link
Text Link

Investors? Possibly you!

FATMAN-G. No, that isn’t my rap name, although vaguely appropriate (I mean, the G part of course). That’s our new moniker for the Avengers[1] of the equity capital markets, to which we have now added Tesla. FATMAN-G is Facebook, Amazon, Tesla, Microsoft, Apple, Netflix, and Google.

Stock Picking
Markets
Read More
Text Link

Avengers Assemble!

Amazon is, very simply, a tremendous company. Google is also a tremendous company. The same goes for Microsoft, Apple, Netflix, and Facebook. These are the superheroes of capital markets. In these FAMANG stocks, the Avengers have assembled.

Markets
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

Was “Value” Just a Hot Hand Thing?

In 1861, at the outset of the Civil War in the United States, Union Pacific issued 20 shares in its IPO.

Behavioural Finance
Factors
Valuation
Asset Pricing
Read More
Text Link

The Hot-Hand Fallacy Fallacy Fallacy?

Many of you will be familiar with the so-called “hot-hand” fallacy, or (perhaps) the lack thereof.

Factors
Sports
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

Cue the Camouflage

The S&P 500 is up 6.5% this year. That’s a total return number, and given what is going on out there, it’s pretty impressive.

Behavioural Finance
Markets
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

The Times that Try Stock-Pickers’ Souls

On first principles, there is one way to generate excess stock market returns over the long term, and it isn’t to “own winners at any price.”

Markets
Factors
Stock Picking
Valuation
Read More
Navigations
HomeTeamDrew's viewsPressContact
About Albert Bridge Capital

Albert Bridge Capital manages concentrated long-only equity portfolios for institutional investors.The hallmark of its Alpha Europe strategy is the application of tenets of behavioural finance to a rigorous, fundamental, process-oriented research process.

Regulatory Disclaimers
Stewardship codePillar three disclosureRTS 28Legal & regulatoryPrivacy policyCookies policy
How to get in Touch
Michelin House
Suite 109, 81 Fulham Road
London, SW3 6RD
info@albertbridgecapital.com
+44 (0) 203 826 0206

Subscribe to Drew's Views

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Albert Bridge Capital LLP is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority of the United Kingdom © Albert Bridge Capital 2021.
Website by SW10media.com
Investors? Possibly you!
Avengers Assemble!
How Did This Even Happen?
Was “Value” Just a Hot Hand Thing?
The Hot-Hand Fallacy Fallacy Fallacy?
Cue the Camouflage
The Times that Try Stock-Pickers’ Souls
A Different Game?
Heads I Win
A New Ice Age?
Grandpa Stocks
Bubblicious?
On Negative Oil and Futures Prices
In Flew Enza
COVID-19 and Equity Markets
Regulators to the Rescue?
Perspective
We Don’t Make Pizzas
Ben Graham the Growth Investor?
Not a Bad Decade
On the Impact of the FAMANGs
Europe vs the US: Is it all about sector exposures?
Behavioural Finance is Finance
America’s Decade
Known Unknowns and Share Prices
Prediction, Publicity, and Paul the Octopus
Are Company Visits Good or Bad?
Everybody Was Kung Fu Fighting?
Voting Machines and Weighing Machines
The DCF is the Randy Watson of Valuation
The Sacrilegious Diaries: Measuring the Impact of Portfolio Turnover
Passively Irrational?
Imagine No Inflation
The Sacrilegious Diaries: The Benefits of Turnover
Stay in the Game
I’m Volatility?
Woody was Right
When You Can’t Wait For Tomorrow
James Harden and Alpha
Groundhog Day and Overnight Returns
Debiasing and Alpha
Peak “Peak Car” ?
The Right Way
The First Step to Regaining Credibility
The Futility of Market Timing
Visualizing the Arithmetic of Active Management
123 Years of the Dow
Sweet Emotion?
Share Buybacks, Bad Companies, and Bear Markets
Risk and Portfolio Theory
Keeping Calm and Carrying On
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator: The Volkswagen Chronicles, Ten Years Later
We’d Rather Not Sleep
Factor Timing, Should You Try?
The Mathematics of Maintaining Bet Size
The Grandfather of Behavioural Investing
On Sexual Chocolate and Semi-Annual Reporting
Island Economies and Risk
Build a Bear?
Data Science and Alpha
We’re all Value Investors
Hunting for Alpha
Career Risk, Alpha, and Contrarian Investing
Passive Flows and Wheelbarrows
God Bless the Shorts
Sell in May, and Go Away?
Equilibrium Happens
Horses and Stocks
Peak Quality?
Bill Sharpe and Hank Aaron
Unwarrented
The Search for Excellence and the Loser’s Game
Fooled by Non-Randomness
Half Hearted Is Half Minded
Still Superman, but without the cape
122 year Dow Jones Histogram: Putting 2017 into context
Pegs, P/E'S and the Value Premium
Rick Barry and Lewis Carroll
Secular Winners and Value Investing
Robots and Alpha
The Voting Machine
Prevous
Next
hometeamdrew's viewspressCOntactRegulatory