Back to Drew's Views
December 10, 2019
Previous
Next

The Search for Excellence and the Loser’s Game

Stock Picking

We’re on a continual search for the very best ideas for our concentrated portfolio.  The “best ideas” component not only requires a continuous and rigorous analysis and reanalysis of the buy case for each of our names (and a continuous monitoring of expected returns), but a similar inspection of the sell case. With the perfect crystal ball, we’d love to know ahead of time which of our positions aren’t going to work out.

Losers game.png
Sometimes

As Charles Ellis suggested in “The Loser’s Game” in 1975 [1], whether we are playing tennis or golf, fighting wars, or picking stocks, that the best strategy for “winning” may simply be a strategy that avoids the most mistakes.

If we take a direct read-across of the “avoid losers” mantra , there is an immediate conflict with the Alpha Europe philosophy of taking risk, and preparing for – if not embracing – losers and “mistakes”. So long as we are more accurate than not, and so long as the winners contribute as much or more as the losers detract, then we should actually want to see big losers in the portfolio.

Additionally, the part of our process that embraces risks, and attempts to de-bias ourselves as stock pickers, is actually very much aligned with Ellis’s “Loser’s Game” message. As he eloquently (and presciently) states (way back in 1975):

“The more important (success) is to (the stock-pickers) self-esteem and sense of inner worth – the more tenaciously he will hold on to old concepts, and the more insistently ignore or reject new evidence that conflicts with his old and familiar concept of the world.”

Moreover, perhaps counterintuitively, he adds that the problem is even more acute for higher-achievers:

“This behavior is particularly common among very bright people because they can so easily develop and articulate self-persuasive logic to justify the conclusions they want to keep.”

Of course, fast forward by 40+ years, and we all know this as confirmation bias. Thus, as we construct our buy and sell cases for each Focus List name at Alpha Europe, some of which eventually do qualify for the portfolio, our job is stay on top of these names after their entry, poking holes in the buy case, and seeking disconfirming information throughout the process.

As we do so, we want to have a culture where it is exceedingly acceptable for any of us to raise our hand and say “we just lost a key point of the buy case” or “this element of the sell case just became much more likely” or even “this isn’t playing out like I expected it to, doesn’t feel right, and I am losing conviction.” In other words, it is okay, at Alpha Europe, to be wrong. Our ultimate success here, and evaluation thereof, will not be as much based on whether we had individual positive outcomes, but by how we followed the process.

We actually want to be wrong on occasion, and should realize that being wrong is the necessary counterpart of being right. Additionally, given our desire to have a very concentrated portfolio, this means that our search for the perfect ideas is continual.  With a less concentrated, more diversified portfolio, we perhaps wouldn’t be as stringent, but in a portfolio of 15-25 names, an integral part of the process is discarding those that we think won’t be strong contributors, and developing even stronger conviction in those that will.

In the words (again) of Charles Ellis:

“Most researchers should spend their time making sell decisions. Almost all of the really big trouble that you’re going to experience in the next year is in your portfolio right now.”

Of course we don’t know what the future holds, other than we should continue our search for excellence. If an investment stops ticking any of our boxes, we don’t have to own it.  We should never be encumbered by where, or when, we bought a security. Instead, we should keep repeating to ourselves:

“If we were launching the fund tomorrow, and you wouldn’t buy the stock, then we shouldn’t own it today.”

FOOTNOTES

[1] The Loser’s Game, C.D. Ellis, The Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 31, No. 4, July/August 1975, 19-26. New York: Financial Analysts Federation. https://www.ifa.com/pdfs/ellis_charles_the_losers_game_1975.pdf

Download PDF

Topics

Stock Picking

DISCLAIMER

The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the post’s author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Albert Bridge Capital, or its affiliates. This post has been provided solely for information purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer or any advice or recommendation to purchase any securities or other financial instruments and may not be construed as such. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information in this post or found by following any link in this post.

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Text Link

Heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Text Link
Text Link

On the Relationship Between Gasoline Prices and Vehicle Demand

As it relates to demand for pickup trucks and SUVs, gasoline prices may not matter matter as much as they used to.

Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

Which One Are You?

So, if you are in the taxi, what is your first move (and you can’t say “do nothing”). Are you trimming or adding?

Markets
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

Was Ben Graham a Quant?

The short, and relatively unknown, paper is chock full of wonderful anecdotes and pearls of wisdom, but it was the interview portion that really caught my attention.

Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

Just How Cheap is Europe vs. the US, and Should it Be?

As it turns out, it isn’t that the people are paying a bigger growth premium for US Growth over European Growth; but instead it is that people are paying a (much) bigger multiple for US Value than for European Value.

Markets
Stock Picking
Valuation
Read More
Text Link

Are American Companies Better than European Ones?

If we again go back and start the clock on January 1, 1980, and stop it thirty years later on December 31, 2009, we see that the S&P 500 generated annual total returns (with dividends) of 11.5%. During that exact same period, guess what the annual returns of the MSCI Europe were? Also 11.5%. This last decade, however, things have gotten out of whack.

Markets
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

Rumpelstiltskin and Meme Stock Investing

“What sort of sorcery is this?” Is this financial alchemy powering a perpetual motion engine that will result in higher and higher share prices?

Markets
Stock Picking
Valuation
Read More
Navigations
HomeTeamDrew's viewsPressContact
Disclaimers
Legal & regulatoryPrivacy policyCookies policy
How to get in Touch
info@albertbridgecapital.com

Subscribe to Drew's Views

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
© Albert Bridge Capital 2022
Website by SW10media.com
On the Relationship Between Gasoline Prices and Vehicle Demand
Sell in May and Go Away?
The Politics of Passive Investing
If Growth Stocks Sell Off Will They Bring Value Stocks Down with Them?
Stock Market History, Illuminated
Which One Are You?
Was Ben Graham a Quant?
Do Short Term Flows Permanently Affect Share Prices?
Just How Cheap is Europe vs. the US, and Should it Be?
Are American Companies Better than European Ones?
Rumpelstiltskin and Meme Stock Investing
Archegos, Disclosure, and Price Discovery
It's All About the Fundies
On Unlimited Upside
A Memo to Investors
Investors? Possibly you!
Avengers Assemble!
How Did This Even Happen?
Was “Value” Just a Hot Hand Thing?
The Hot-Hand Fallacy Fallacy Fallacy?
Cue the Camouflage
The Times that Try Stock-Pickers’ Souls
A Different Game?
Heads I Win
A New Ice Age?
Grandpa Stocks
Bubblicious?
On Negative Oil and Futures Prices
In Flew Enza
COVID-19 and Equity Markets
Regulators to the Rescue?
Perspective
We Don’t Make Pizzas
Ben Graham the Growth Investor?
Not a Bad Decade
On the Impact of the FAMANGs
Europe vs the US: Is it all about sector exposures?
Behavioural Finance is Finance
America’s Decade
Known Unknowns and Share Prices
Prediction, Publicity, and Paul the Octopus
Are Company Visits Good or Bad?
Everybody Was Kung Fu Fighting?
Voting Machines and Weighing Machines
The DCF is the Randy Watson of Valuation
The Sacrilegious Diaries: Measuring the Impact of Portfolio Turnover
Passively Irrational?
Imagine No Inflation
The Sacrilegious Diaries: The Benefits of Turnover
Stay in the Game
I’m Volatility?
Woody was Right
When You Can’t Wait For Tomorrow
James Harden and Alpha
Groundhog Day and Overnight Returns
Debiasing and Alpha
Peak “Peak Car” ?
The Right Way
The First Step to Regaining Credibility
The Futility of Market Timing
Visualizing the Arithmetic of Active Management
123 Years of the Dow
Sweet Emotion?
Share Buybacks, Bad Companies, and Bear Markets
Risk and Portfolio Theory
Keeping Calm and Carrying On
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator: The Volkswagen Chronicles, Ten Years Later
We’d Rather Not Sleep
Factor Timing, Should You Try?
The Mathematics of Maintaining Bet Size
The Grandfather of Behavioural Investing
On Sexual Chocolate and Semi-Annual Reporting
Island Economies and Risk
Build a Bear?
Data Science and Alpha
We’re all Value Investors
Hunting for Alpha
Career Risk, Alpha, and Contrarian Investing
Passive Flows and Wheelbarrows
God Bless the Shorts
Equilibrium Happens
Horses and Stocks
Peak Quality?
Bill Sharpe and Hank Aaron
Unwarrented
The Search for Excellence and the Loser’s Game
Fooled by Non-Randomness
Half Hearted Is Half Minded
Still Superman, but without the cape
122 year Dow Jones Histogram: Putting 2017 into context
Pegs, P/E'S and the Value Premium
Rick Barry and Lewis Carroll
Secular Winners and Value Investing
On Passive Flows, Smart Money, and Alpha
The Voting Machine
Prevous
Next
homeTeamdrew's viewspressCOntactDisclaimers