Back to Drew's Views
December 10, 2019
Previous
Next

We’d Rather Not Sleep

Stock Picking

There is a tilt in our portfolio toward value stories where we think the consensus investor is biased against processing improving fundamentals. That said, we’re happy to own any name along the spectrum of consensus sentiment, and even the rare “expensive” story, so long as each investment case has idiosyncratic fundamental features that we believe are materially better than consensus expectations. In its essence, our process insists that we have some sort of distance between ourselves and what we believe to be the market view; and a belief that the market view will eventually change. Hopefully, this process will continue to enable us to generate significant alpha across our concentrated portfolio of individual equity securities.

Some investors are drawn to different types of ideas. Some may like to own high-visibility business models, with obviously compelling characteristics, and little regard for consensus expectations or the views of Mr. Market. In other words, some investors really like to sleep well at night.            

We don’t like to sleep well at night.  

If we are too comfortable, we are consensus, and we lose. That is the nature of this game; if we aren’t agonising over an investment, then it isn’t risky, and if it isn’t risky we can’t generate excess returns. This is especially important to consider during times of market distress.  

rather not sleep 1.png
A necessary ingredient…

In fact, we have a fundamental problem with investors that ignore fundamental expectations. If stock prices are reflecting views of the consensus investor (and they are) then the only way to have a chance to generate alpha is to own a different portfolio than Mr. Market owns. That’s just math. To do so with the most potential risk per unit of reward, we must own securities where we have a view on fundamental developments that conflicts sharply with that of Mr. Market, and we must be more right than we are wrong.  

Sure, some managers might have a “strategy” where they hold “good companies” at any price, hoping that others will one day decide to pay even higher multiples for these same “good” companies – but as we have said many times, we just don’t think that market-timing is a skill that many have.

And let’s be clear, if you own a nice bond-proxying, high-quality, defensive, secularly-growing name with a PEG of 3x at 25x earnings, you aren’t picking stocks, you are playing top-down themes, and market-timing. You are hoping that interest rates stay low, and that the consensus investor will not only continue to be comfortable paying high multiples to sleep easy at night, but that the consensus investor will need to pay even higher multiples for these same obviously good stories tomorrow.

Granted, those types of stories have worked well for a few years now, but we’ve been in this business long enough to know that they work until they don’t. And when they don’t, Mr. Market will lose his wits, because he is used to getting a lot more sleep.

Do we care about moats, margins of safety and high-quality businesses managed by CEOs and CFOs with strong character? Of course we do, but we also know there is a price for everything. We agree with Benjamin Graham in that regard. [1]

So, even if a company has an unregulated monopoly, an iron-clad, sole-sourced, riskless 100 year contract to deliver these goods to inelastic consumers, and a management team that consists of a resurrected Mother Teresa, Martin Luther King, Mahatma Ghandi, Winston Churchill, and Nelson Mandela, it can still be priced wrong.  

There can still be too much risk given the likely reward of ownership. Nothing is a buy at any price, and nearly everything is a buy at some price (again, see Graham).

We do not own a portfolio of unlisted, private investments. We do not own companies for which there has been no price discovery, with such a price set by Mr. Market. We do not own companies where we cannot find a divergent view between Alpha Europe and that of our enemy, the consensus investor. Our task, and our goal, is to engage in battle with our opponent, and to consequently (we hope) generate significant alpha in the process. To do so requires us to be successful in two simple areas:

We must expertly and rigorously analyse and predict company fundamentals, and do so objectively; and we must discover a behavioural bias that is preventing Mr. Market from doing the same.‍

If that sounds simple, that’s because it is. The work required is onerous, arduous and time-consuming, and de-biasing ourselves is a difficult pursuit that requires constant attention; but these two basic rules of engagement are fairly straightforward. As our process plays out, we expect to lose a few battles here and there, but hope to win the war.  

FOOTNOTES

[1] “The current market price already takes into account the consensus of opinion as to future prospects.”  Security Analysis, 1934, page 614.

“Nearly every issue might conceivably be cheap in one price range and dear in another.”  Security Analysis, 1934, page 22.

“A stock may have investment merit at one price level but not at another.”  Security Analysis, 1934, page 55.

Download PDF

Topics

Stock Picking

DISCLAIMER

The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the post’s author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Albert Bridge Capital, or its affiliates. This post has been provided solely for information purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer or any advice or recommendation to purchase any securities or other financial instruments and may not be construed as such. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information in this post or found by following any link in this post.

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Text Link

Heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Text Link
Text Link

On the Relationship Between Gasoline Prices and Vehicle Demand

As it relates to demand for pickup trucks and SUVs, gasoline prices may not matter matter as much as they used to.

Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

Which One Are You?

So, if you are in the taxi, what is your first move (and you can’t say “do nothing”). Are you trimming or adding?

Markets
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

Was Ben Graham a Quant?

The short, and relatively unknown, paper is chock full of wonderful anecdotes and pearls of wisdom, but it was the interview portion that really caught my attention.

Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

Just How Cheap is Europe vs. the US, and Should it Be?

As it turns out, it isn’t that the people are paying a bigger growth premium for US Growth over European Growth; but instead it is that people are paying a (much) bigger multiple for US Value than for European Value.

Markets
Stock Picking
Valuation
Read More
Text Link

Are American Companies Better than European Ones?

If we again go back and start the clock on January 1, 1980, and stop it thirty years later on December 31, 2009, we see that the S&P 500 generated annual total returns (with dividends) of 11.5%. During that exact same period, guess what the annual returns of the MSCI Europe were? Also 11.5%. This last decade, however, things have gotten out of whack.

Markets
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

Rumpelstiltskin and Meme Stock Investing

“What sort of sorcery is this?” Is this financial alchemy powering a perpetual motion engine that will result in higher and higher share prices?

Markets
Stock Picking
Valuation
Read More
Navigations
HomeTeamDrew's viewsPressContact
Disclaimers
Legal & regulatoryPrivacy policyCookies policy
How to get in Touch
info@albertbridgecapital.com

Subscribe to Drew's Views

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
© Albert Bridge Capital 2022
Website by SW10media.com
On the Relationship Between Gasoline Prices and Vehicle Demand
Sell in May and Go Away?
The Politics of Passive Investing
If Growth Stocks Sell Off Will They Bring Value Stocks Down with Them?
Stock Market History, Illuminated
Which One Are You?
Was Ben Graham a Quant?
Do Short Term Flows Permanently Affect Share Prices?
Just How Cheap is Europe vs. the US, and Should it Be?
Are American Companies Better than European Ones?
Rumpelstiltskin and Meme Stock Investing
Archegos, Disclosure, and Price Discovery
It's All About the Fundies
On Unlimited Upside
A Memo to Investors
Investors? Possibly you!
Avengers Assemble!
How Did This Even Happen?
Was “Value” Just a Hot Hand Thing?
The Hot-Hand Fallacy Fallacy Fallacy?
Cue the Camouflage
The Times that Try Stock-Pickers’ Souls
A Different Game?
Heads I Win
A New Ice Age?
Grandpa Stocks
Bubblicious?
On Negative Oil and Futures Prices
In Flew Enza
COVID-19 and Equity Markets
Regulators to the Rescue?
Perspective
We Don’t Make Pizzas
Ben Graham the Growth Investor?
Not a Bad Decade
On the Impact of the FAMANGs
Europe vs the US: Is it all about sector exposures?
Behavioural Finance is Finance
America’s Decade
Known Unknowns and Share Prices
Prediction, Publicity, and Paul the Octopus
Are Company Visits Good or Bad?
Everybody Was Kung Fu Fighting?
Voting Machines and Weighing Machines
The DCF is the Randy Watson of Valuation
The Sacrilegious Diaries: Measuring the Impact of Portfolio Turnover
Passively Irrational?
Imagine No Inflation
The Sacrilegious Diaries: The Benefits of Turnover
Stay in the Game
I’m Volatility?
Woody was Right
When You Can’t Wait For Tomorrow
James Harden and Alpha
Groundhog Day and Overnight Returns
Debiasing and Alpha
Peak “Peak Car” ?
The Right Way
The First Step to Regaining Credibility
The Futility of Market Timing
Visualizing the Arithmetic of Active Management
123 Years of the Dow
Sweet Emotion?
Share Buybacks, Bad Companies, and Bear Markets
Risk and Portfolio Theory
Keeping Calm and Carrying On
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator: The Volkswagen Chronicles, Ten Years Later
We’d Rather Not Sleep
Factor Timing, Should You Try?
The Mathematics of Maintaining Bet Size
The Grandfather of Behavioural Investing
On Sexual Chocolate and Semi-Annual Reporting
Island Economies and Risk
Build a Bear?
Data Science and Alpha
We’re all Value Investors
Hunting for Alpha
Career Risk, Alpha, and Contrarian Investing
Passive Flows and Wheelbarrows
God Bless the Shorts
Equilibrium Happens
Horses and Stocks
Peak Quality?
Bill Sharpe and Hank Aaron
Unwarrented
The Search for Excellence and the Loser’s Game
Fooled by Non-Randomness
Half Hearted Is Half Minded
Still Superman, but without the cape
122 year Dow Jones Histogram: Putting 2017 into context
Pegs, P/E'S and the Value Premium
Rick Barry and Lewis Carroll
Secular Winners and Value Investing
On Passive Flows, Smart Money, and Alpha
The Voting Machine
Prevous
Next
homeTeamdrew's viewspressCOntactDisclaimers