Back to Drew's Views
December 10, 2019
Previous
Next

Bill Sharpe and Hank Aaron

Stock Picking
Sports

If we define being “right” or “wrong” as outperforming or underperforming the market, respectively, then in order to be right or wrong, we basically need to hold something different (either securities or bet sizes) than the “market”.   Bill Sharpe taught us that over two decades ago. [1]   That’s just math.  Outperforming, very simply, requires deviating from the norm.  In other words, it requires risk-taking.  And there are two sides to the “risk-taking” proposition.  On one side, there are gains; on the other, losses.  The existence of one requires the possibility of the other.  

If we start off with a random-walk base case, then in order to tilt the risk/reward equation in our favour demands a process or informational edge.  Our specific approach requires the gathering of relevant fundamental information about specific companies (and the simultaneous dismissal of irrelevant information), the unbiased interpretation of that data in a sector context, rigorous modelling of those fundamentals, and then an identification of decision-making biases currently preventing the consensus investor from digesting the same data and arriving at our view.

That’s pretty much it, and we think and hope that this moves us off the random-walk base case toward something more in our favour.  Being 65% correct over time across the portfolio, for example, might be something that an investor should strive for.  Of course you might even strive for even higher accuracy, but at 65% you very well may generate more than satisfactory long-term excess returns.  But here is the toughest pill to swallow in that equation:

“If you want to be 65% right, you implicitly also want to be 35% wrong.”

HA and BS.png
That coulda been a double play.

Of course you would like to make money in every single individual investment you make.  Yet you must not only realize that you are taking risk, and that risk begets reward, but accept that risk when it is presented.  This is one of the hardest lessons any of us can learn, and frankly, I am still in the process of learning it myself.  When that loser reveals itself, I sometimes need to remind myself of Henry Aaron.  “Hammerin’ Hank” hit 755 home runs, eclipsing Babe Ruth’s 714, but he is also third on the all-time list for grounding into double plays.  With a runner on first, Hank went to the plate expecting the possibility of one or the other.  

If he truly never wanted a remote chance of grounding into a double play, he never would have hit a home run.  Instead, he wanted a chance to ground out, embraced the risk/reward, and with that mentality, over a long and successful career, he hit over twice as many home runs as groundouts into double plays.

Staying within the baseball metaphor, whether you can hit .500, .600, or even .700, it will still take the aggregation of many seasons where we perform above or below our long term batting average before that average is revealed.  During this journey, you should hope to see more wins than losses, and more doubles than strikeouts.  You’ll almost certainly also ground into some double plays too, and you may even hit a few grand slams.  

To find these home runs, stand-up triples, or bunt singles, our view is that identifying favourable risk and reward equations for individual securities requires one to do things differently than everyone else does.  It gets back to doing things in a way that you think is better, but that your competition hasn’t yet adopted.  It gets back to being simultaneously unconventional and smart, and a willingness to look unconventional and stupid.

FOOTNOTES

[1] The Arithmetic of Active Management, William F. Sharpe, Financial Analysts Journal, January/February 1991, Vol. 47, No. 1:  7-9

Download PDF

Topics

Stock Picking
Sports

DISCLAIMER

The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the post’s author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Albert Bridge Capital, or its affiliates. This post has been provided solely for information purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer or any advice or recommendation to purchase any securities or other financial instruments and may not be construed as such. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information in this post or found by following any link in this post.

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Text Link

Heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Text Link
Text Link

Investors? Possibly you!

FATMAN-G. No, that isn’t my rap name, although vaguely appropriate (I mean, the G part of course). That’s our new moniker for the Avengers[1] of the equity capital markets, to which we have now added Tesla. FATMAN-G is Facebook, Amazon, Tesla, Microsoft, Apple, Netflix, and Google.

Stock Picking
Markets
Read More
Text Link

Avengers Assemble!

Amazon is, very simply, a tremendous company. Google is also a tremendous company. The same goes for Microsoft, Apple, Netflix, and Facebook. These are the superheroes of capital markets. In these FAMANG stocks, the Avengers have assembled.

Markets
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

How Did This Even Happen?

No, I’m not talking about the winner of the Presidential election or COVID-19 or 2020. I’m talking about something I saw Rex Chapman tweet out over the weekend.

Sports
Read More
Text Link

The Hot-Hand Fallacy Fallacy Fallacy?

Many of you will be familiar with the so-called “hot-hand” fallacy, or (perhaps) the lack thereof.

Factors
Sports
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

Cue the Camouflage

The S&P 500 is up 6.5% this year. That’s a total return number, and given what is going on out there, it’s pretty impressive.

Behavioural Finance
Markets
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

The Times that Try Stock-Pickers’ Souls

On first principles, there is one way to generate excess stock market returns over the long term, and it isn’t to “own winners at any price.”

Markets
Factors
Stock Picking
Valuation
Read More
Navigations
HomeTeamDrew's viewsPressContact
About Albert Bridge Capital

Albert Bridge Capital manages concentrated long-only equity portfolios for institutional investors.The hallmark of its Alpha Europe strategy is the application of tenets of behavioural finance to a rigorous, fundamental, process-oriented research process.

Regulatory Disclaimers
Stewardship codePillar three disclosureRTS 28Legal & regulatoryPrivacy policyCookies policy
How to get in Touch
Michelin House
Suite 109, 81 Fulham Road
London, SW3 6RD
info@albertbridgecapital.com
+44 (0) 203 826 0206

Subscribe to Drew's Views

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Albert Bridge Capital LLP is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority of the United Kingdom © Albert Bridge Capital 2021.
Website by SW10media.com
Investors? Possibly you!
Avengers Assemble!
How Did This Even Happen?
Was “Value” Just a Hot Hand Thing?
The Hot-Hand Fallacy Fallacy Fallacy?
Cue the Camouflage
The Times that Try Stock-Pickers’ Souls
A Different Game?
Heads I Win
A New Ice Age?
Grandpa Stocks
Bubblicious?
On Negative Oil and Futures Prices
In Flew Enza
COVID-19 and Equity Markets
Regulators to the Rescue?
Perspective
We Don’t Make Pizzas
Ben Graham the Growth Investor?
Not a Bad Decade
On the Impact of the FAMANGs
Europe vs the US: Is it all about sector exposures?
Behavioural Finance is Finance
America’s Decade
Known Unknowns and Share Prices
Prediction, Publicity, and Paul the Octopus
Are Company Visits Good or Bad?
Everybody Was Kung Fu Fighting?
Voting Machines and Weighing Machines
The DCF is the Randy Watson of Valuation
The Sacrilegious Diaries: Measuring the Impact of Portfolio Turnover
Passively Irrational?
Imagine No Inflation
The Sacrilegious Diaries: The Benefits of Turnover
Stay in the Game
I’m Volatility?
Woody was Right
When You Can’t Wait For Tomorrow
James Harden and Alpha
Groundhog Day and Overnight Returns
Debiasing and Alpha
Peak “Peak Car” ?
The Right Way
The First Step to Regaining Credibility
The Futility of Market Timing
Visualizing the Arithmetic of Active Management
123 Years of the Dow
Sweet Emotion?
Share Buybacks, Bad Companies, and Bear Markets
Risk and Portfolio Theory
Keeping Calm and Carrying On
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator: The Volkswagen Chronicles, Ten Years Later
We’d Rather Not Sleep
Factor Timing, Should You Try?
The Mathematics of Maintaining Bet Size
The Grandfather of Behavioural Investing
On Sexual Chocolate and Semi-Annual Reporting
Island Economies and Risk
Build a Bear?
Data Science and Alpha
We’re all Value Investors
Hunting for Alpha
Career Risk, Alpha, and Contrarian Investing
Passive Flows and Wheelbarrows
God Bless the Shorts
Sell in May, and Go Away?
Equilibrium Happens
Horses and Stocks
Peak Quality?
Bill Sharpe and Hank Aaron
Unwarrented
The Search for Excellence and the Loser’s Game
Fooled by Non-Randomness
Half Hearted Is Half Minded
Still Superman, but without the cape
122 year Dow Jones Histogram: Putting 2017 into context
Pegs, P/E'S and the Value Premium
Rick Barry and Lewis Carroll
Secular Winners and Value Investing
Robots and Alpha
The Voting Machine
Prevous
Next
hometeamdrew's viewspressCOntactRegulatory