.png)
A nightly sort of the most active US names is usually dominated by ETFs. Earlier this month, we took a peek at the most heavily traded names on one particular day. In that session, four of the top ten (by value) were ETFs. The most active individual equity security was Google, and yet it traded over 70% less than the S&P 500 ETF (the “SPYDERS”). The least active single-issue name in the S&P 500 that day was News Corp, which managed less than $20 million worth of volume. Meanwhile, the SPYDERS (of which NWSA is an implicit constituent) traded over $12 billion.
Folks much smarter than us are thinking deeply about this, and wondering if it is at least possible that these flows (whether purely passive or diversified-ish “systematic active” ETF flows of any type) are impacting cross correlation between individual securities, or perhaps even volatility across the entire market. It is not a foregone conclusion that this is the case – however there is also a significant chance that the tail is wagging the dog here over some time horizon.
But even if this is the case, there may be a silver lining. All of this activity, to use an extremely technical term, may or may not put security prices out of whack. If so, they won’t stay out of whack forever.
As Mr. Market pushes that wheelbarrow of idiosyncratic risk up the mountain, a great deal of potential energy is building. The higher he goes (aka, the more correlated things become), the more the energy builds. Eventually, the alpha will come cascading down the mountain. We don’t know when it will, but we know it will. This of course doesn’t guarantee success for the stock-picker (there will be as many winners as there are losers, broadly), but increasing passive flows do not necessarily spell the end of stock-picking opportunities.
They may even spell the beginning.
FOOTNOTES
DISCLAIMER
The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the post’s author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Albert Bridge Capital, or its affiliates. This post has been provided solely for information purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer or any advice or recommendation to purchase any securities or other financial instruments and may not be construed as such. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information in this post or found by following any link in this post.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Are American Companies Better than European Ones?
If we again go back and start the clock on January 1, 1980, and stop it thirty years later on December 31, 2009, we see that the S&P 500 generated annual total returns (with dividends) of 11.5%. During that exact same period, guess what the annual returns of the MSCI Europe were? Also 11.5%. This last decade, however, things have gotten out of whack.
Read MoreIt's All About the Fundies
It wasn’t passive flows that mattered. It wasn’t interest rates that mattered. It wasn’t the multiple that mattered. It wasn’t an ever-expanding infectious narrative that mattered. No analyst on the buy or sell side came remotely close to understand the market opportunity, the share, the profitability. It was about better vision, modelling. and analysis. It was all about the fundies.
Read MoreInvestors? Possibly you!
FATMAN-G. No, that isn’t my rap name, although vaguely appropriate (I mean, the G part of course). That’s our new moniker for the Avengers[1] of the equity capital markets, to which we have now added Tesla. FATMAN-G is Facebook, Amazon, Tesla, Microsoft, Apple, Netflix, and Google.
Read More
