Back to Drew's Views
August 11, 2020
Previous
Next

The Times that Try Stock-Pickers’ Souls

Markets
Factors
Stock Picking
Valuation

On first principles, there is one way to generate excess stock market returns over the long term, and it isn’t to “own winners at any price.”  

Sure, in hindsight it was, but that is very convenient.  It’s very convenient to now ignore the stocks we thought were winners, but weren’t.  It’s also very convenient to draw parallels between past winners and newer companies as if it is a foregone conclusion they too will win in similar fashion.  Not everyone can be Amazon, in fact, no one else may ever be Amazon[1].  

Nor do excess returns come from “owning good companies at any price” or “owning high-quality[2] companies at any price.”  The “one way” to outperform is to buy a concentrated portfolio of securities that Mr. Market doesn’t own; names which are shunned because Mr. Market has become overly pessimistic about the fundamental prospects for businesses that are better than he believes or realizes.  

That’s it.  That’s the formula.

This often isn’t sexy, it often isn’t fashionable, and it often isn’t fun.  March of 2020 wasn’t very fun at all.  However, a successful investor outperforming Mr. Market over the long term owns companies that, by definition, Mr. Market believes are pretty stupid to own.  

Instead, Mr. Market often thinks growthy, glamorous, names are much smarter to own. They definitely are smarter looking.  And it is surely more entertaining to own these stocks.  It’s also easier to sleep at night[3].  They are obviously more dynamic companies and, in many cases, they indeed are better companies.

And there are periods where these growthy, good and glamorous names do tremendously, well.  During these episodes, it downright sucks to be a fundamentally-driven value investor.  

Equity markets had one of those periods in 1998-1999, and – in our view – they may be having another one of them now.  

Paraphrasing Thomas Paine, these are the times that try stock-pickers’ souls.

The stock market, at least at the moment, seems mostly sensitive to whether or not a company is classified as a “good” or “bad” business.  

And “good” means your stock has already appreciated, is already expensive, and is showing even the slightest degree of business momentum.

And no price is high enough for “good”.  Because good is good, so why wouldn’t you own it?

“Bad” is the opposite.  Bad is an already-inexpensive stock that has already sold off, and one that has already exhibited fundamental weakness, even if it’s likely a short-term phenomenon.  

And no price is low enough for “bad”.  Because bad is bad, so why would you own it?

As maddening as this behavior is, it is typical of investor psychology at peaks and troughs; and consequently, the “price” of growth is higher than it has ever been.

That one above is from AQR, and this one below from their quant-competitor Research Affiliates.

In other words, in terms of entry points, at least from a historical perspective, this is about as good as it gets for the “value” of value – even better than at the peak of the tech bubble.

People shouted about the “new era” in 1972 and again in 1999; and they are shouting about a new era in 2020.  

There is no new era.  Stocks are still worth the present value of their future cash flows.

While narratives can dominate in the short term, and while the short term is sometimes longer than we like, the fundamentals eventually matter.  They have to.  Although it may feel like it to some shareholders (Tesla shareholders, perhaps), we just aren’t buying pieces of art here.  We are buying fractions of the equity value of large, liquid, listed, enterprises.  The fundamentals “have to matter” because these fractions of equity, these shares, are worth the present value of all future cash flows to that fraction of ownership.  

This may be a novel concept to Robinhood traders, I know, but that’s where we always end up.  Sure, there are greater fools in any short run, and even smart folks may join in, hoping to sell to someone else at a higher price (and some are so smart and have such high conviction that they may not even realize that is what they are doing). Similarly, in other cases, these smart folks may be shorting, hoping to cover as greater-panicking fools sell after the price has fallen more.

That’s basically the paradigm today for growth and value today.  

Ben Graham is famously (although incorrectly) attributed for writing that the market was a voting machine in the short term, but a weighing machine in the long term.  However apocryphal, as we wrote in Voting Machines and Weighing Machines[4] “we 100% agree with Graham on this, but admit there is a wonderful debate to be had about when ‘eventually’ arrives.”

We have no idea when “eventually” is going to arrive.  Whether or not we are three days or three years away from this growth bubble popping, we don’t know.  But we are tremendously confident that it isn’t “different this time.”


Subscribe and sign up with your email address to receive the latest news and updates
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

FOOTNOTES

[1] And even in Amazon’s case, the stock price performance has mostly been about producing fundamentals that surprised not only the bears, but even the bulls.With perfect 10-year foresight, on the actual numbers Amazon printed, they too were a value stock for a very long time. https://www.albertbridgecapital.com/post/secular-winners-and-value-investing

[2] https://www.albertbridgecapital.com/post/peak-quality

[3] https://www.albertbridgecapital.com/post/wed-rather-not-sleep

[4]https://www.albertbridgecapital.com/post/voting-machines-and-weighing-machines

Download PDF

Topics

Markets
Factors
Stock Picking
Valuation

DISCLAIMER

The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the post’s author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Albert Bridge Capital, or its affiliates. This post has been provided solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer or any advice or recommendation to purchase any securities or other financial instruments and may not be construed as such. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information in this post or found by following any link in this post.

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Text Link

Heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Text Link
Text Link

Hedge Fund Investing, Turnover, and Taxes

For taxable investors, the impact of taxes on long term post-tax returns really, really matters. But how much exactly do they matter? What sort of outperformance does one of your managers need to generate to offset the penalty of not buying and holding forever?

Portfolio Management
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

OK, 2022 Was a Disaster for Tesla - What Next?

There still could be significant downside, but it's going to take fundamental misses to get there; and $TSLAQ has to admit that the screaming short at $400 has fallen 70%.

Markets
Behavioural Finance
Read More
Text Link

Stock Market History, Illuminated, 2022 Style

I’ve been keeping a graphic of the long-term performance of the US stock market for many years now, and I’ve been sharing this information in the histogram below. I think it does a reasonable job of revealing how long-term returns are manufactured and the tilts over time. I’ve color-chunked the data by decade to highlight decades of historical weakness as well as periods of strength. I’ve also added additional tables and charts which I think are interesting, and in some cases, stunning.

Asset Pricing
Factors
Markets
Valuation
Read More
Text Link

What Stands in the Way Becomes the Way

I don’t think that Aurelius, Frost or Zweig would disagree that the road less traveled might have a little more alpha in it.

Markets
Behavioural Finance
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

Interest Rates and Growth Stocks

It's very possible, if not likely, that the move in growth stocks from 2017 through 2020 probably wasn’t caused or justified by a move in interest rates, but that people believed, and acted like, it was.

Asset Pricing
Factors
Behavioural Finance
Valuation
Read More
Text Link

For Investors, a "Never-Sell" Mantra is a Song for Fools

On the misleading claims of Hendrik Bessembinder about diversification; and the convenient, post-hoc, and the spurious conclusion to always buy and hold.

Asset Pricing
Markets
Portfolio Management
Stock Picking
Read More
Navigations
HomeTeamDrew's viewsPressContact
Disclaimers
Legal & regulatoryPrivacy policyCookies policy
How to get in Touch
info@albertbridgecapital.com

Subscribe to Drew's Views

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
© Albert Bridge Capital 2022
Website by SW10media.com
homeTeamdrew's viewspressCOntactDisclaimers