Back to Drew's Views
August 11, 2020
Previous
Next

The Times that Try Stock-Pickers’ Souls

Markets
Factors
Stock Picking
Valuation

On first principles, there is one way to generate excess stock market returns over the long term, and it isn’t to “own winners at any price.”  

Sure, in hindsight it was, but that is very convenient.  It’s very convenient to now ignore the stocks we thought were winners, but weren’t.  It’s also very convenient to draw parallels between past winners and newer companies as if it is a foregone conclusion they too will win in similar fashion.  Not everyone can be Amazon, in fact, no one else may ever be Amazon[1].  

Nor do excess returns come from “owning good companies at any price” or “owning high-quality[2] companies at any price.”  The “one way” to outperform is to buy a concentrated portfolio of securities that Mr. Market doesn’t own; names which are shunned because Mr. Market has become overly pessimistic about the fundamental prospects for businesses that are better than he believes or realizes.  

That’s it.  That’s the formula.

This often isn’t sexy, it often isn’t fashionable, and it often isn’t fun.  March of 2020 wasn’t very fun at all.  However, a successful investor outperforming Mr. Market over the long term owns companies that, by definition, Mr. Market believes are pretty stupid to own.  

Instead, Mr. Market often thinks growthy, glamorous, names are much smarter to own. They definitely are smarter looking.  And it is surely more entertaining to own these stocks.  It’s also easier to sleep at night[3].  They are obviously more dynamic companies and, in many cases, they indeed are better companies.

And there are periods where these growthy, good and glamorous names do tremendously, well.  During these episodes, it downright sucks to be a fundamentally-driven value investor.  

Equity markets had one of those periods in 1998-1999, and – in our view – they may be having another one of them now.  

Paraphrasing Thomas Paine, these are the times that try stock-pickers’ souls.

The stock market, at least at the moment, seems mostly sensitive to whether or not a company is classified as a “good” or “bad” business.  

And “good” means your stock has already appreciated, is already expensive, and is showing even the slightest degree of business momentum.

And no price is high enough for “good”.  Because good is good, so why wouldn’t you own it?

“Bad” is the opposite.  Bad is an already-inexpensive stock that has already sold off, and one that has already exhibited fundamental weakness, even if it’s likely a short-term phenomenon.  

And no price is low enough for “bad”.  Because bad is bad, so why would you own it?

As maddening as this behavior is, it is typical of investor psychology at peaks and troughs; and consequently, the “price” of growth is higher than it has ever been.

That one above is from AQR, and this one below from their quant-competitor Research Affiliates.

In other words, in terms of entry points, at least from a historical perspective, this is about as good as it gets for the “value” of value – even better than at the peak of the tech bubble.

People shouted about the “new era” in 1972 and again in 1999; and they are shouting about a new era in 2020.  

There is no new era.  Stocks are still worth the present value of their future cash flows.

While narratives can dominate in the short term, and while the short term is sometimes longer than we like, the fundamentals eventually matter.  They have to.  Although it may feel like it to some shareholders (Tesla shareholders, perhaps), we just aren’t buying pieces of art here.  We are buying fractions of the equity value of large, liquid, listed, enterprises.  The fundamentals “have to matter” because these fractions of equity, these shares, are worth the present value of all future cash flows to that fraction of ownership.  

This may be a novel concept to Robinhood traders, I know, but that’s where we always end up.  Sure, there are greater fools in any short run, and even smart folks may join in, hoping to sell to someone else at a higher price (and some are so smart and have such high conviction that they may not even realize that is what they are doing). Similarly, in other cases, these smart folks may be shorting, hoping to cover as greater-panicking fools sell after the price has fallen more.

That’s basically the paradigm today for growth and value today.  

Ben Graham is famously (although incorrectly) attributed for writing that the market was a voting machine in the short term, but a weighing machine in the long term.  However apocryphal, as we wrote in Voting Machines and Weighing Machines[4] “we 100% agree with Graham on this, but admit there is a wonderful debate to be had about when ‘eventually’ arrives.”

We have no idea when “eventually” is going to arrive.  Whether or not we are three days or three years away from this growth bubble popping, we don’t know.  But we are tremendously confident that it isn’t “different this time.”

FOOTNOTES

[1] And even in Amazon’s case, the stock price performance has mostly been about producing fundamentals that surprised not only the bears, but even the bulls.With perfect 10-year foresight, on the actual numbers Amazon printed, they too were a value stock for a very long time. https://www.albertbridgecapital.com/post/secular-winners-and-value-investing

[2] https://www.albertbridgecapital.com/post/peak-quality

[3] https://www.albertbridgecapital.com/post/wed-rather-not-sleep

[4]https://www.albertbridgecapital.com/post/voting-machines-and-weighing-machines

Download PDF

Topics

Markets
Factors
Stock Picking
Valuation

DISCLAIMER

The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the post’s author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Albert Bridge Capital, or its affiliates. This post has been provided solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer or any advice or recommendation to purchase any securities or other financial instruments and may not be construed as such. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information in this post or found by following any link in this post.

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Text Link

Heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Text Link
Text Link

On the Relationship Between Gasoline Prices and Vehicle Demand

As it relates to demand for pickup trucks and SUVs, gasoline prices may not matter matter as much as they used to.

Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

Sell in May and Go Away?

Turns out there may actually be something to the old Sell in May and Go Away adage - at least over the last 80+ years.

Markets
Asset Pricing
Read More
Text Link

If Growth Stocks Sell Off Will They Bring Value Stocks Down with Them?

Growth stocks crushed just about everything from 2017 through 2021. Not that they necessarily will, but if they do give back some or all of their gains, given their weightings, times will be tough for broader indices. But what about the value names within them, will they sell off in sympathy as well? Of course no one knows, including ourselves, but we take a quick look at behavior of value names as the tech bubble sold off from 2000 through 2002. This example may be worth some consideration.

Markets
Factors
Read More
Text Link

Stock Market History, Illuminated

Some year-end charts and tables asking some big questions about what comes next.

Asset Pricing
Factors
Markets
Valuation
Read More
Text Link

Which One Are You?

So, if you are in the taxi, what is your first move (and you can’t say “do nothing”). Are you trimming or adding?

Markets
Stock Picking
Read More
Text Link

Was Ben Graham a Quant?

The short, and relatively unknown, paper is chock full of wonderful anecdotes and pearls of wisdom, but it was the interview portion that really caught my attention.

Stock Picking
Read More
Navigations
HomeTeamDrew's viewsPressContact
Disclaimers
Legal & regulatoryPrivacy policyCookies policy
How to get in Touch
info@albertbridgecapital.com

Subscribe to Drew's Views

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
© Albert Bridge Capital 2022
Website by SW10media.com
On the Relationship Between Gasoline Prices and Vehicle Demand
Sell in May and Go Away?
The Politics of Passive Investing
If Growth Stocks Sell Off Will They Bring Value Stocks Down with Them?
Stock Market History, Illuminated
Which One Are You?
Was Ben Graham a Quant?
Do Short Term Flows Permanently Affect Share Prices?
Just How Cheap is Europe vs. the US, and Should it Be?
Are American Companies Better than European Ones?
Rumpelstiltskin and Meme Stock Investing
Archegos, Disclosure, and Price Discovery
It's All About the Fundies
On Unlimited Upside
A Memo to Investors
Investors? Possibly you!
Avengers Assemble!
How Did This Even Happen?
Was “Value” Just a Hot Hand Thing?
The Hot-Hand Fallacy Fallacy Fallacy?
Cue the Camouflage
The Times that Try Stock-Pickers’ Souls
A Different Game?
Heads I Win
A New Ice Age?
Grandpa Stocks
Bubblicious?
On Negative Oil and Futures Prices
In Flew Enza
COVID-19 and Equity Markets
Regulators to the Rescue?
Perspective
We Don’t Make Pizzas
Ben Graham the Growth Investor?
Not a Bad Decade
On the Impact of the FAMANGs
Europe vs the US: Is it all about sector exposures?
Behavioural Finance is Finance
America’s Decade
Known Unknowns and Share Prices
Prediction, Publicity, and Paul the Octopus
Are Company Visits Good or Bad?
Everybody Was Kung Fu Fighting?
Voting Machines and Weighing Machines
The DCF is the Randy Watson of Valuation
The Sacrilegious Diaries: Measuring the Impact of Portfolio Turnover
Passively Irrational?
Imagine No Inflation
The Sacrilegious Diaries: The Benefits of Turnover
Stay in the Game
I’m Volatility?
Woody was Right
When You Can’t Wait For Tomorrow
James Harden and Alpha
Groundhog Day and Overnight Returns
Debiasing and Alpha
Peak “Peak Car” ?
The Right Way
The First Step to Regaining Credibility
The Futility of Market Timing
Visualizing the Arithmetic of Active Management
123 Years of the Dow
Sweet Emotion?
Share Buybacks, Bad Companies, and Bear Markets
Risk and Portfolio Theory
Keeping Calm and Carrying On
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator: The Volkswagen Chronicles, Ten Years Later
We’d Rather Not Sleep
Factor Timing, Should You Try?
The Mathematics of Maintaining Bet Size
The Grandfather of Behavioural Investing
On Sexual Chocolate and Semi-Annual Reporting
Island Economies and Risk
Build a Bear?
Data Science and Alpha
We’re all Value Investors
Hunting for Alpha
Career Risk, Alpha, and Contrarian Investing
Passive Flows and Wheelbarrows
God Bless the Shorts
Equilibrium Happens
Horses and Stocks
Peak Quality?
Bill Sharpe and Hank Aaron
Unwarrented
The Search for Excellence and the Loser’s Game
Fooled by Non-Randomness
Half Hearted Is Half Minded
Still Superman, but without the cape
122 year Dow Jones Histogram: Putting 2017 into context
Pegs, P/E'S and the Value Premium
Rick Barry and Lewis Carroll
Secular Winners and Value Investing
On Passive Flows, Smart Money, and Alpha
The Voting Machine
Prevous
Next
homeTeamdrew's viewspressCOntactDisclaimers