Back to press
Prevous
Next
This is some text inside of a div block.

BAILLIE GIFFORD'S NEVER-SELL MANTRA IS A SONG FOR FOOLS

‍

Click here for full article

By Andrew Dickson

On Monday, the FT published an opinion piece written by Lawrence Burns, an investment manager at Scottish fund house Baillie Gifford.

The piece was titled “Why it is usually a mistake for investors to take profits” with its stand first suggesting “a tiny number of superstar companies account for returns from equity markets.” 

Baillie Gifford, among other things, is well known for its prescient investment in Tesla. The author also referred to an investment Goldman Sachs made in Alibaba, and how it invested both too little and sold too early. Using these examples, the author then makes the claim that “the upside of not selling is nearly unlimited.” 

In an after-the-fact diagnosis, Burns is implying that a biased sample of self-selected winners like Tesla and Alibaba suggest that it is a mistake to ever sell any shares in any companies that you think are “winners” either historically or prospectively. Yes, it is true, if you sold Tesla too early, you didn’t make as much money as those who didn’t. But what about those investments that weren’t Tesla? And what about former consensus winners like Eastman Kodak, or Cisco, or Nokia? 

Justifying his view, Burns cites research by professor Hendrik Bessembinder which suggests that a) a majority of stocks do not outperform 1 month US treasury bills b) 1 per cent of companies accounted for all global net wealth creation and c) 99% of companies were a “distraction to the task of managing money”.

Burns suggests that Bessembinder’s research should “shake the foundations” of the investment industry and that we need a “vastly different mentality” to “focus on the possibility of extreme upside”. 

That sure would be nice, wouldn’t it? If we all could just sit back and take our money out of 99 percent of our investments and all plough it in the same 1 per cent that everyone else already knows about, and then expect to outperform.

As preposterous as it sounds, the conclusions drawn from Bessembinder’s paper were also misinformed in the first place. It isn’t entirely Burns’ fault, Bessembinder himself presented his observations and conclusions in a sensational way.

His original paper was based on US stock market data going back to 1926. In it, he claimed that “the best four per cent of listed companies explain the net gain for the entire US stock market since 1926”. But dig deep and you’ll find that these were not the top four per cent of a broad index like the S&P 500, but instead the25,300 companies that have appeared in the Center for Research in Security Prices (CRSP) over the past 90 years. 

So that was 1,092 companies, or over twice as many “big winners” as there are in the S&P 500.

Bessembinder then states “simply put, large positive returns to a few stocks offset the modest or negative returns to more typical stocks.” In other words, he is effectively asserting, as if it is an epiphany, that the portfolio names with the highest excess returns drive the excess returns of the portfolio. Well, duh.

But back to the 1,092 companies that companies that “accounted for all the net wealth creation”. Well, that was a bit misleading as well. It turns out that another 9,579 stocks also outperformed US treasury bills.

Similarly, Bessembinder claimed that “less than half the names outperformed US Treasuries.” Well, less than half the names underperformed US Treasuries too. About five per cent of the universe was in line, and the balance was split between the relative winners and the relative losers.

Bessembinder chose to exclude this finding from the abstract and conclusion, although he admitted this point in a footnote; yet still concluded that “poorly diversified portfolios will underperform because they omit the relatively few stocks that generate large positive returns.” 

Very frankly, the data just doesn’t support his argument, and conclusions drawn from it are misinformed.

Subsequent extensions of this paper (here and here) utilise a global dataset, but the issues persist; both with the presentation and conclusions. But Baillie Gifford is still running with it, because Bessembinder tells the story that confirms their recent success, presumably abetted by their still-large stake in Tesla.

Good on Baillie Gifford for generating such excellent returns. Yet I sincerely believe Burns’ advice is the worst possible going forward.

For the rest of us, I suggest following more tried and tested advice from a different BG:

"Nearly every issue (i.e. stock) might conceivably be cheap in one price range and dearin another.” - Benjamin Graham

My guess going forward is that this advice is going to help people make or save a lot more money than the never-sell-anything mantra proposed by the fund managers at Baillie Gifford.

‍

‍

You might Also Like

WHAT IS TESLA'S AUTOMOTIVE BUSINESS WORTH?

On the valuation of Tesla, and a bit of debate between a long and a short.
Read more

DREW CHATS WITH MATT ZEIGLER

Drew's journey, warts & all.
Read more

DREW CHATS WITH BOB SEAWRIGHT AND BRIAN PORTNOY

On the legacy of Danny Kahneman
Read more

TESLA'S BIGGEST PROBLEM: CARS

Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found at https://www.ft.com/tour. https://www.ft.com/content/485109f3-9118-4d75-a202-58bd2b89da45 In order to make money in the stock market, you have to anticipate fundamental developments that exceed those already implicitly baked into the share price. Despite the stock’s fall from grace, I’m afraid that many Tesla shareholders still don’t understand that. In our view, it is going to take a miracle for Tesla shareholders to avoid more pain.
Read more
Navigations
HomeTeamDrew's viewsPressContact
Disclaimers
Legal & regulatoryPrivacy policyCookies policy
How to get in Touch
info@albertbridgecapital.com

Subscribe to Drew's Views

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
© Albert Bridge Capital 2022
Website by SW10media.com
homeTeamdrew's viewspressCOntactDisclaimers
WHAT IS TESLA'S AUTOMOTIVE BUSINESS WORTH?
DREW CHATS WITH MATT ZEIGLER
DREW CHATS WITH BOB SEAWRIGHT AND BRIAN PORTNOY
TESLA'S BIGGEST PROBLEM: CARS
DREW CHATS WITH JENS BALLE
VOLKSWAGEN AND PORSCHE SE ARE STUCK IN WALL STREET'S PITS. STOCK INVESTORS, START YOUR ENGINES!
DREW CHATS WITH DOWNTOWN JOSH BROWN
DREW CHATS WITH MEB FABER
PUTTING A PRICE ON TESLA POST MUSK
THE TROUBLE WITH TESLA'S ECONOMICS
DREW CHATS WITH TOBY CARLISLE AND JAKE TAYLOR
OK, 2022 WAS A DISASTER FOR TESLA. WHAT NEXT?
DREW CHATS WITH MORGAN HOUSEL AND JAMIE CATHERWOOD
DREW CHATS WITH DANIEL CROSBY
WHY EUROPEAN VALUE STOCKS MIGHT WIN
EUROPE'S COMPANIES LANGUISH IN THE SLOW LANE
DREW CHATS WITH SRI PRAKASH
DREW CHATS WITH FRANK GARCIA & COLBY DONOVAN
THE ‘TESLA-FINANCIAL COMPLEX’
HERE'S THE MATH FOR TESLA'S STOCK PRICE IF IT BECOMES THE APPLE OF CAR MAKERS
YOU NEEDN'T HOLD YOUR STOCK WINNERS
BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS' LATEST BIAS
AA’s BIGGEST SHAREHOLDER REJECTS 'DERISORY' OFFER
AA’s BIGGEST SHAREHOLDER SETS UP ROADBLOCK TO BUY-OUT WITH OBJECTION TO "DERISORY' OFFER
AA TAKEOVER TALKS TRIGGER SHAREHOLDER BREAKDOWN
STALLING AA CALLS FOR RESCUE OF ITS OWN
THERE'S SUCH A THING AS TOO MANY MEETINGS WITH THE CEO
VALUE STOCK INVESTORS HOPE VACCINE BOOST CAN LAST
BAILLIE GIFFORD'S NEVER-SELL MANTRA IS A SONG FOR FOOLS
DREW CHATS WITH TOBY CARLISLE
I'VE PULLED OUT ALL THE STOPS FOR TESLA, BUT CAN'T FIND UPSIDE.
THIS BULL MARKET ISN'T AS BIG AS YOU THINK
DREW CHATS WITH TED SEIDES
INMARSAT BUYOUT FACES FRESH OPPOSITION AS COURT RULING LOOMS
BUBBLE ECONOMICS: THE ACTIVE VS. PASSIVE DEBATE
SHORT SELLERS "SHOULD BE KNIGHTED, NOT SPITED"
FINANCIAL TWITTER LOSES A SOURCE OF HUMILITY AND WISDOM, BUT GOOD VOICES REMAIN
THE FUTILITY OF MARKET TIMING
ALBERT BRIDGE BORDERS ON ‘SUGGESTIVISM’ IN BACKING MICRO FOCUS RECOVERY - PROFILER
ALBERT BRIDGE’S DREW DICKSON AT IRA SOHN
VOLKSWAGEN STOCK IS CHEAP AND HAS LOTS OF HORSEPOWER
THE DAY VOLKSWAGEN BRIEFLY CONQUERED THE WORLD
A CHALLENGE TO THE BIGGEST IDEA IN BEHAVIOURAL FINANCE
ALBERT BRIDGE CAPITAL’S DICKSON DISCUSSES NOBEL PRIZE WINNER RICHARD THALER
ALBERT BRIDGE CAPITAL'S DICKSON INCLUDED IN THE HEDGE FUND JOURNAL TOMORROW'S TITANS 2016
ALBERT BRIDGE HIRES FORMER BAML’S KENNY FOR MARKETING
ALBERT BRIDGE HIRES BAML CAP INTRO HEAD
EX-FORTRESS AND MORGAN STANLEY HEAVYWEIGHT JOINS HEDGE FUND STARTUP
EX-PERELLA WEINBERG MANAGER RAISES $150M FOR STARTUP
FORMER PERELLA WEINBERG PARTNERS EXEC DICKSON LAUNCHING NEW HEDGE FUND
EX-PERELLA WEINBERG PARTNER LAUNCHES ALBERT BRIDGE CAPITAL
EX-PERELLA WEINBERG PARTNER TO LAUNCH EQUITY HEDGE FUND