Back to press
Prevous
Next
This is some text inside of a div block.

BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS' LATEST BIAS

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-01-13/behavioral-economics-latest-bias-seeing-bias-wherever-it-looks

‍

‍Behavioral economics, it seems, might just have a bias problem of its own.

Once dismissed as little more than psychobabble, the discipline, which marries classical economics with psychology, has won widespread acclaim over the past decade. It’s left an indelible mark on business, finance and policy making by explaining all the mind-bending ways people, try as they might, don’t act rationally. Along with the Nobel Prizes, it’s become a bona fide cultural phenomenon. Best sellers like Daniel Kahneman’s “Thinking, Fast and Slow,” countless TED talks and even a cameo turn by one of its founders in the blockbuster movie “The Big Short.”

Yet for a small, but vocal group of skeptics, the field has quickly become a victim of its own astounding success. Call it the “bias bias.”

Drawing on the work of longtime critic Gerd Gigerenzer, an expert in psychology at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development, they point to the tendency of those who have embraced its ideas to see biases everywhere -- even when there are none. Not only do they bemoan the cottage industry of pseudoscience that’s cropped up around behavioral economics, but they also see some deep, fundamental flaws with its approach.

Non-specialists appropriating the language of behavioral economics is “a little like a poor man’s way of saying, ‘Hey, I’m smart,’” said Emanuel Derman, a professor of financial engineering at Columbia University. “The public loves it, but I don’t think it’s worth very much.”

While examples like the hot-hand fallacy in sports and the Dunning-Kruger effect (where people who don’t know a lot about something literally don’t know that they don’t know) have helped change the way we think we understand human behavior, it’s not hard to see how things could have gotten out of hand.

A Wikipedia entry for cognitive biases currently lists nearly 200 entries. They range from the actor-observer bias -- attributing other people’s actions to their personalities while justifying your own as being dependent upon the situation in which you find yourself -- to the zero-sum bias, where situations are incorrectly perceived to be like, you guessed it, a zero-sum game in which the winner takes all, to even the IKEA effect, where people place disproportionately high values on things they partially assemble themselves.

Are they all legit? Gigerenzer, who has made himself into something of a bête noire among behavioral economists over the past couple decades, has his doubts. In his 2018 paper, he concluded that most studies on cognitive biases are flawed. They either rely on small sample sizes, misinterpret individual errors for systematic biases or underestimate how people absorb information based on how a fact or question is framed.

One oft-cited bias is the phenomenon of overconfidence. To the behavioral economist, business and finance are rife with examples of irrational decisions based on big heads and outsize egos. But what appears as a bias can often be perfectly deliberate and rational, Gigerenzer says.

For example, take an analyst who sells exchange rate or stock market forecasts. His predictions will invariably be mostly wrong -- because if they were right most of the time, he wouldn’t have to work for a living. So the analyst, and others like him, tend to exude confidence because “few would buy their advice” if they were more honest about the accuracy of their calls.

Or how most people confidently believe Rome is south of New York, based on temperatures alone, even when it’s actually located further north. In isolation, it might seem like yet another example of overconfidence. But ask the same question comparing all big cities randomly rather than using a hand-picked pair and the bias disappears, according to Gigerenzer.

“Behavioral economics claims overconfidence is a robust phenomenon,” he said. “Our research has shown that there’s nothing robust about it. There’s a seduction to misrepresent reasonable behavior for biases.”

Granted, Gigerenzer’s beef with behavioral economics, and its most influential proponents, like Kahneman, Amos Tversky and Richard H. Thaler, isn’t new. If you google “behavioral economics criticism,” it doesn’t take long before Gigerenzer’s name comes up, again and again. And he hasn’t done himself any favors with his combative style. Even among his defenders, there’s a sense that criticizing the discipline has become a bit of a hobbyhorse for Gigerenzer, and a slightly tiresome one at that.

Kahneman, who was awarded the Nobel Prize in 2002, and Tversky long ago took issue with what they say is Gigerenzer’s willful misinterpretation of their positions and ideas, which misleads readers. Others, like Carnegie Mellon’s Alex Imas, say the problem is that Gigerenzer often uses oversimplified arguments to dismiss theories that he doesn’t actually take head-on. For example, Gigerenzer once asserted behavioral economists had replaced Homo economicus with Homer Simpson as their model for human behavior.

For his part, Thaler, a Nobel laureate in his own right who runs an asset management firm when he isn’t teaching behavioral science at the University of Chicago, suggested his own heuristic: ignore Gigerenzer.

‍

Nevertheless, as behavioral economics becomes increasingly ubiquitous in everyday life, even proponents have started to acknowledge the potential pitfalls.

In a recent episode of Ted Seides’ “Capital Allocators” podcast, Albert Bridge Capital’s Drew Dickson talked about how his team integrates behavioral economics into its investing approach. After listing some of the biases they watch out for, Dickson named the “bias bias” as his new favorite.

“People are now talking about behavioral finance so much, and a lot of them are relatively new to it, they almost want to start looking as if there’s definitely going to be a bias here,” said Dickson, who declined to comment for this story. “You’re biased to find a bias.”

Gigerenzer isn’t the only one looking to poke holes in behavioral economics.

Just this month, Nassim Nicholas Taleb, of “The Black Swan” fame, retweeted an earlier post highlighting an unfinished draft of his own takedown. Titled “Nudge Sinister, How Behavioral Economics is Dangerous Verbalism,” it summarizes 12 different errors that lead economists to produce or identify biases that aren’t really biases.

Ole Peters, a fellow at the London Mathematical Laboratory, has turned his attention to what he believes is an even bigger, more fundamental issue.

To oversimplify, he argues the entire field of economics is flawed because it doesn’t correctly account for the problem of time, in what he’s termed as the ergodicity problem. (If you want to get deep into the weeds, you can read his academic paper, published last month, here.) That results in discrepancies between how we would expect a rational actor to react to potential gains and losses, and our actual intuitions, a key consideration in the development of Kahneman and Tversky’s prospect theory.

The upshot, according to Peters, is that in coming with “psychological arguments about human behavior” to patch up the discrepancy, behavioral economics mistakes a symptom of the problem for the problem itself.

“Economics is firmly stuck in the wrong conceptual space,” he wrote.

You might Also Like

WHAT IS TESLA'S AUTOMOTIVE BUSINESS WORTH?

On the valuation of Tesla, and a bit of debate between a long and a short.
Read more

DREW CHATS WITH MATT ZEIGLER

Drew's journey, warts & all.
Read more

DREW CHATS WITH BOB SEAWRIGHT AND BRIAN PORTNOY

On the legacy of Danny Kahneman
Read more

TESLA'S BIGGEST PROBLEM: CARS

Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found at https://www.ft.com/tour. https://www.ft.com/content/485109f3-9118-4d75-a202-58bd2b89da45 In order to make money in the stock market, you have to anticipate fundamental developments that exceed those already implicitly baked into the share price. Despite the stock’s fall from grace, I’m afraid that many Tesla shareholders still don’t understand that. In our view, it is going to take a miracle for Tesla shareholders to avoid more pain.
Read more
Navigations
HomeTeamDrew's viewsPressContact
Disclaimers
Legal & regulatoryPrivacy policyCookies policy
How to get in Touch
info@albertbridgecapital.com

Subscribe to Drew's Views

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
© Albert Bridge Capital 2022
Website by SW10media.com
homeTeamdrew's viewspressCOntactDisclaimers
WHAT IS TESLA'S AUTOMOTIVE BUSINESS WORTH?
DREW CHATS WITH MATT ZEIGLER
DREW CHATS WITH BOB SEAWRIGHT AND BRIAN PORTNOY
TESLA'S BIGGEST PROBLEM: CARS
DREW CHATS WITH JENS BALLE
VOLKSWAGEN AND PORSCHE SE ARE STUCK IN WALL STREET'S PITS. STOCK INVESTORS, START YOUR ENGINES!
DREW CHATS WITH DOWNTOWN JOSH BROWN
DREW CHATS WITH MEB FABER
PUTTING A PRICE ON TESLA POST MUSK
THE TROUBLE WITH TESLA'S ECONOMICS
DREW CHATS WITH TOBY CARLISLE AND JAKE TAYLOR
OK, 2022 WAS A DISASTER FOR TESLA. WHAT NEXT?
DREW CHATS WITH MORGAN HOUSEL AND JAMIE CATHERWOOD
DREW CHATS WITH DANIEL CROSBY
WHY EUROPEAN VALUE STOCKS MIGHT WIN
EUROPE'S COMPANIES LANGUISH IN THE SLOW LANE
DREW CHATS WITH SRI PRAKASH
DREW CHATS WITH FRANK GARCIA & COLBY DONOVAN
THE ‘TESLA-FINANCIAL COMPLEX’
HERE'S THE MATH FOR TESLA'S STOCK PRICE IF IT BECOMES THE APPLE OF CAR MAKERS
YOU NEEDN'T HOLD YOUR STOCK WINNERS
BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS' LATEST BIAS
AA’s BIGGEST SHAREHOLDER REJECTS 'DERISORY' OFFER
AA’s BIGGEST SHAREHOLDER SETS UP ROADBLOCK TO BUY-OUT WITH OBJECTION TO "DERISORY' OFFER
AA TAKEOVER TALKS TRIGGER SHAREHOLDER BREAKDOWN
STALLING AA CALLS FOR RESCUE OF ITS OWN
THERE'S SUCH A THING AS TOO MANY MEETINGS WITH THE CEO
VALUE STOCK INVESTORS HOPE VACCINE BOOST CAN LAST
BAILLIE GIFFORD'S NEVER-SELL MANTRA IS A SONG FOR FOOLS
DREW CHATS WITH TOBY CARLISLE
I'VE PULLED OUT ALL THE STOPS FOR TESLA, BUT CAN'T FIND UPSIDE.
THIS BULL MARKET ISN'T AS BIG AS YOU THINK
DREW CHATS WITH TED SEIDES
INMARSAT BUYOUT FACES FRESH OPPOSITION AS COURT RULING LOOMS
BUBBLE ECONOMICS: THE ACTIVE VS. PASSIVE DEBATE
SHORT SELLERS "SHOULD BE KNIGHTED, NOT SPITED"
FINANCIAL TWITTER LOSES A SOURCE OF HUMILITY AND WISDOM, BUT GOOD VOICES REMAIN
THE FUTILITY OF MARKET TIMING
ALBERT BRIDGE BORDERS ON ‘SUGGESTIVISM’ IN BACKING MICRO FOCUS RECOVERY - PROFILER
ALBERT BRIDGE’S DREW DICKSON AT IRA SOHN
VOLKSWAGEN STOCK IS CHEAP AND HAS LOTS OF HORSEPOWER
THE DAY VOLKSWAGEN BRIEFLY CONQUERED THE WORLD
A CHALLENGE TO THE BIGGEST IDEA IN BEHAVIOURAL FINANCE
ALBERT BRIDGE CAPITAL’S DICKSON DISCUSSES NOBEL PRIZE WINNER RICHARD THALER
ALBERT BRIDGE CAPITAL'S DICKSON INCLUDED IN THE HEDGE FUND JOURNAL TOMORROW'S TITANS 2016
ALBERT BRIDGE HIRES FORMER BAML’S KENNY FOR MARKETING
ALBERT BRIDGE HIRES BAML CAP INTRO HEAD
EX-FORTRESS AND MORGAN STANLEY HEAVYWEIGHT JOINS HEDGE FUND STARTUP
EX-PERELLA WEINBERG MANAGER RAISES $150M FOR STARTUP
FORMER PERELLA WEINBERG PARTNERS EXEC DICKSON LAUNCHING NEW HEDGE FUND
EX-PERELLA WEINBERG PARTNER LAUNCHES ALBERT BRIDGE CAPITAL
EX-PERELLA WEINBERG PARTNER TO LAUNCH EQUITY HEDGE FUND